← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 196 (not an original page number)
Unit 196 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
y, the more comprehensive
nature of our book from the point of view of the leading of a wise and
gracious divine providence. With God’s help, we shall be guided by
justice and impartiality according to the law of brotherly and universal
love, and that which will truly profit the one universal church of Christ
in all its parts.
2. The author wishes at the outset to present his judgment with
regard to the origin of the M.B. Church reached on the basis of the
material, personal recollections and diligent inquiry from the “older
generation.” a) The organization of a separate “M.B. Church,” in the
midst of the “South Russian Mennonite Brotherhood,” based on the
Scriptures and the most essential ideas of Menno, given the secularized
state of the largest part of the Russian Mennonites and the inability and
partial reluctance of the church councils generally to oppose the
corruption, was necessary and proved to be salutary for all of the
Russian Mennonites. Generally speaking, however, the founders of the
M.B. Church were neither intellectually nor spiritually well-enough
prepared for the task: several of the co-founders were decidedly
incompetent and were exposed by the subsequent events graciously
directed by God; many were finally expelled from the group by the
wholesome element; others left of their own accord; still others repented
of their mistakes and sins, in the same way in which the whole M.B.
Church now and then has openly confessed and condemned its errors (cf.
Confession of Faith, 1900/1902, “Explanation”),— remaining in the
church with modest positions brought on by the errors they had
committed. But even some of the better elements, through the fault of
individuals who sinned, lost faith in the goodness of the cause and could
not again, whether through their own fault or that of the church, be
reconciled to it. But to the upright and those who humbled themselves a
merciful God granted much grace that through them, as through "broken
rods,” a situation has arisen where we today have the honor and the
duty to co-operate in the work that benefits the entire Mennonite
confessional fellowship in Russia and America, and to participate in
building God’s kingdom generally. But all of those amongst us who
sense our inadequacy (it is to be hoped that the great majority of the
M.B. Church belongs to this group), say with heartfelt sincerity: Not
unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but unto Thy name be glory!
Introduction
203
b) May the worthy reader kindly keep this basic perspective of the
author in mind as he reads the following, where, God grant, light and
shadow may be dispensed with justice.
3. The generally very sad conditions in the Molotschna (Taurida) §72
and Chortitza (Ekaterinoslav) colonies of the Mennonite Brotherhood in
Russia can be readily perceived from the preceding account concerning
the most recent history of the Mennonites in Prussia and the events in
Russia, and will not be elabo
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…