← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 214 (not an original page number)
Unit 214 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ord.
Either— or! No third way! "He who believes and is baptized shall be
saved; but he who does not believe shall be damned,” are the words of
our loving Savior in Mark 16:16, and with this word He divides all
m ankin d into two classes, into believers and unbelievers. Cursed is
everyone who adds a third class. Therefore, beloved, in my very first
sermon, I send out to you this call: either— or. Either a believer or an
unbeliever; either converted or unconverted; either a natural man or a
regenerate man; either a sheep or a goat; either on the right or on the
left; either the straight gate, the narrow way or the wide gate and the
broad way; either flesh or Spirit; either God or mammon; either Christ
or Belial; either blessing or curse; either life or death; either salvation or
condemnation ; either heaven or hell! There is no third! This choice I will
continually place before you, neither will I permit you to remain
together, believer and unbeliever, but you shall become separated
according to the words of Paul in II Cor. 6:14ff.: “Be ye not unequally
yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness
with unrighteousness? And what communion hath light with darkness?
And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath he that
believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God
with idols?” For that reason I am preaching faction and am no friend of
the pitiable unity of believers and unbelievers, by which the believer
loses his faith and the unbeliever does not come to a knowledge of his
belief. Especially in these days, when the time of decision has come so
very near, and, as it seems to me, the Lord has in a special way sent His
angel, in order to gather the tares into sheaves and the good grain into
His bams. Therefore especially I call out with all my might: “You
believers, you partakers of the inheritance and of salvation, go out from
the world, separate yourselves from the unbelievers, and even if they
bear the name of ‘pietist’ or ‘brethren,’ avoid them and separate
yourselves from them, the wretched, pitiable half-believing, the hypo-
crites, mere outward and mouth Christians, who, though they say
‘I believe,’ do not have it in their hearts. If there are such among
you, who with every decisive “either-or" immediately become fearful
and anxious, who approve of outward discipline and order, but are
an enemy of the inner decisive life from God, such who always strive to
reconcile the big factions that stand against each other, and seek to fill
the chasm that the Lord Himself has set between believers and
unbelievers ; those who for the sake of outward peace and comfort which
222
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
one ordinarily enjoys in indecisiveness, putting at stake the eternal rest
that remains for the people of God (Heb. 4:9), who have come out of
Egypt; if there are such among you— and these will not be lacking— who
fear every decisive word in o
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…