← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 218 (not an original page number)
Unit 218 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ging episcopal powers, began solemnly to depart from the
foundation of a positive Christian confession, which all Bible-believing
evangelical Christians, and with them the newly organized M.B. Church,
have always adhered to, and openly began to move in the direction of
what has been called the "new and higher criticism” or neology. At this
point the last ties between Hoffmann and the brethren were severed. 21
7. a) Wuest died believing in his “Christ the crucified” on July 13,
1859, in the forty-second year of his life. Even though the extremists
among the “Joyous” would deny him salvation, as Pastor Dobbert
writes, this was not the case among those who were soon to establish the
“Brethren Church” (M.B. Church). “The righteous perisheth, and no
man layeth it to heart; and merciful men are taken away, none
considering that the righteous is taken away from the evil to come. He
shall enter into peace: they shall rest in their beds, each one walking in
his uprightness,” Isaiah 57:1-2. That is how they assessed his death in
the latter circle. 22 For the formal separation from the church, that is, the
establishment of a new church, was already underway, and one could not
imagine how the “pastor,” who was, after all, a pastor, should choose
between August Lenzmann, Nickolas Schmidt (then still belonging to
the “Church”), Leonhard Sudermann and his comrades, the “rational” or
“ecclesiastical” group on the one hand, and Johann Claassen, Jakob
Reimer, Wilhelm Bartel, etc., the “simple ones,” “children of grace” (as
they liked to call themselves) or “Joyous,” on the other hand. No matter
how independent the criticism of Wuest or the actions of the brethren,
the reverential love for Wuest within our brotherhood circle did not die
out. “God did not lead the pastor any further (in regard to
congregational order, etc.) and has now called this faithful servant to his
rest.” Wuest, the spotless, highly gifted, lovable father of the faith,
was not forgotten, and we name him, along with Menno Simons, among
the first of “the congregation of the first-born of the spirits of the
perfected righteous, whose name is inscribed in heaven, as one of our
teachers who has told us the Word of God,” and we worshipfully thank
Him who gave him to us and who will always remain, in the first and
last instance, our only great “teacher,” Jesus, the mediator of the New
Testament. In His grace. He gave us Menno and Wuest, Spener and
Tersteegen, Zinzendorf and Spurgeon, among many other greater or
lesser characters of church history as teachers of righteousness (Daniel
12:3; Hebrews 12:23, 13:7).
b) The widow of Pastor Wuest, who died in Wuerttemberg
in 1902, writes to the Rev. A. Kroeker regarding her husband’s
226
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
last days and death: “You seem to read out of Prinz’s book [Die
Kolonien der Bruedergemeinde by Jakob Prinz (The Colonies of
the Brotherhood Church)] that my husband finally began to vacillate
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…