← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 221 (not an original page number)
Unit 221 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
r, H. Huebert and others, the Mennonite
brethren celebrated their first private communion service. Elder
Lenzmann, in the letter of March 16, 1863, cited above, relates:
“. . . After I had rejected the request of a few of my church members,
'to extend to them, and those whom they would designate as
believers, the holy communion separately and as often as they should
desire it,’ as an inadmissible innovation which had, to my knowledge,
never taken place in a Mennonite congregation, and which would only
further spiritual pride and destroy the unity of the congregation, they,
together with a few members of other [Mennonite] congregations, began
to celebrate the holy communion among themselves in private, contending
that, according to the Holy Scriptures and their own consciences, they
could no longer participate in it with the unbelievers in the congrega-
tion. . . The Gnadenfeld Chronicle relates that the brethren had
wanted communion to be celebrated every Sunday. 24 The brethren
probably hoped, by this means, eventually to be able to celebrate holy
communion amongst the believers with the least trouble, since the
members of the congregation who thought differently only attended
communion services at certain specific, widely separated times. The fact
that they approached Lenzmann with this request is proof, firstly, that,
in spite of his emerging coolness toward them (cf. H 51 and 52:
“Brotherhood” and “Brotherhood School”) they regarded him as a
bishop and brother in Christ, and, secondly, that they did not readily
leave the established congregations.
b) Jakob Reimer of Gnadenfeld relates the following: “As our
fellowship established itself more firmly on the Word of God, there arose
in us the desire to celebrate the Lord’s Supper more often, and we asked
our Elder Lenzmann to break bread more often, even if this had to be done
Alliance and Communion Fellowship
229
here and there in the homes, as they did in the Acts of the Apostles
2:46-47. But that was not allowed us. Thus it happened in the fall of
1859, two weeks after St. Martin’s, as a few brothers and sisters were
gathered together in Elizabethal in the home of K. W. [Cornelius Wiens],
that they broke bread 25 together in all simplicity and childlikeness,
observing the teaching of Paul in I Cor. 11:23. As soon as this became
known a great commotion arose in the churches, and the elders were
accused of not excommunicating the [participating] members of their
congregations soon enough. In the other congregations they were simply
placed in the ban [a little while later this was combined with a complete
civil ostracism, which ruined many economically]. The Gnadenfeld
congregation proceeded in a somewhat [much!] more mild manner. . . .
Six brothers and sisters, some of whom were young [who had
participated in Elizabethtal], were called before the ministers and forced
to give cm account of their actions. They were admonished and
promised to su
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…