← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 222 (not an original page number)
Unit 222 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
bmit themselves to everything that was not against God’s
Word and their conscience.” Thus far Reimer. On the nineteenth and
twenty-seventh of December, brotherhood meetings took place in
Gnadenfeld where the ministers and the brethren in agreement with
Claassen and Reimer, both of whom had not been present at that
co mmunio n service, pronounced themselves satisfied with the promises
made by the six members. Others, however, were not satisfied with this
and loosed "a barrage [Reimer’s words] against Claassen and me,
screaming: ‘Out with them, they are no better than the rest’ [the six].
The screamers threatened to ‘turn Reimer over to the Area Administra-
tive Office together with all those who agreed with this shameful act.’
Reimer quietly made his way forward to the elder and asked him
to allow them to leave, for he was not willing to allow himself to become
involved with the church brethren, and especially Heinrich Franz, in this
way. Reimer’s and Claassen’s opponents shouted to Lenzmann: ‘Why do
you not allow them to leave?’ until he said in a sorrowful tone: ‘Well,
then, brothers, leave!’ But when it appeared as though only Claassen
and I would go out, Franz called out to Br. Claassen: ‘As a rule you are
such an honest [?] man, so call on your cohorts to come with you!’
Thereupon Claassen turned around and said: ‘Well, brothers!’— whoever
shared his views should follow him. About ten brothers left the church.”
(According to Reimer.)
c) Although the Gnadenfeld congregation lost only about twenty-
five members as a result of this "departure,” it nevertheless also led to
the separation of those who gathered themselves around them as guests
and little by little joined them more formally, as Claassen, Nicholas
Schmidt, Abram Matthies and others had done at an earlier date.
Gnadenfeld had ceased to be the center of the Brotherhood Movement.
Three years later a considerably larger number of those, at this moment
230
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
(1859/60) still regarded as belonging to the Mennonite Church but later
called the “Friends of Jerusalem” (to which group even the worthy
Minister Nikolai Schmidt joined himself), left Gnadenfeld, as they had
earlier left the Brotherhood Movement, and established the “Temple
Church” under the direction of Hoffmann and amidst circumstances that
shook and weakened the Gnadenfeld congregation much more than the
incident related above.
XIV.
THE FOUNDING OF THE INDEPENDENT M.B. CHURCH OF 1860
1. As a result of the “Secession or Founding Document” of January
6, 1860, which Claassen and a few Gnadenfeld members, together with
members of other congregations, had signed,— eighteen heads of f amili es
in all,— and to which Reimer and eight other Gnadenfeld members
(men) agreed on January 18, the essential establishment of an
independent M.B. Church had taken place. 26 Attempts, on the part of
Lenzmann and the other Gnadenfeld ministers, toward reunion were,
a
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…