← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 230 (not an original page number)
Unit 230 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
to their further
treatment or punishment. We only allow ourselves this one request, that,
238
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
as much as the law allows, moderatre measures be employed to bring
these erring ones to a knowledge of their guilt before ultimate steps are
taken. Halbstadt, March 11, 1860. The church elders:
Ratzlaff, War ken tin, Wedel, Lenzmann, Toews.”
8. The last ecclesio-political act of the aged Bishop Bernhard Fast
known 36 to us is a document very favorable to the Brethren and reads as
follows:
"To the Area Administrative Office in Halbstadt!
I cannot sign the explanatory statement which five of the church
elders have drawn up, with regard to the brethren who have dissociated
themselves from our decadent church [thus, literally, did the senior
member of the Molotschna Council of Elders write in an official
document; cf. Mennonitische Blaetter, No. 1, 1863], for the following
reason: because the cause of these brethren [!] has remained quite
unknown to me till now, I find it necessary to acquire a greater
understanding of and more conviction concerning it; and only then, in
accordance with my duty and my findings, will I, as soon as possible,
make my statement. In any case, however, because this is a matter of
some importance and the Lord Inspector of the colonies has required
such a declaration from all congregations and church elders, I consider it
essential that such a statement be requested from the honorable Elder
Friesen [of the Kleine Gemeinde], Tiege, March 15, 1860.
Bernhard Fast, elder.”
9. Elder Friesen of the Kleine Gemeinde, who otherwise very seldom
participated in the joint actions of the church or elders’ council, writes
to the Area Administrative Office— the only document that we possess
from this congregation in the matter concerning the M.B. Church. Even
though written fearfully and with reticence, it nevertheless is explicit in
rejecting all political measures while advocating only Mennonite-
ecclesiastical ones: "... We do not know how to declare and advise
anything except what the Apostle Paul teaches in II Thess. 3:14; . . .
therefore we beg that you not take it amiss if we desire, as much as
possible, to refrain from becoming involved in this matter. Neukirch,
March 24, 1860. Johann Friesen, elder.”
10. Ohrloff’s further Defence of the Brethren and its New State-
ment.
a) Johann Harder, meanwhile ordained to the position of elder by
the aged and sickly honorable Bernhard Fast, writes:
“To the Molotschna Mennonite Area Administrative Office in
Halbstadt :
The Struggle
239
“Because we were unable to present a declaration at the conference
held on the 11th of this month with regard to the religious fellowship
which has arisen in the colonies, due to our ignorance in this matter,
we invited some of the members of this fellowship in order to receive
from them a more particular written explanation of their intentions,
which we could use as a
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…