← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 231 (not an original page number)
Unit 231 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
nswer or statement to the issues posed
by the Area Administrative Office in its letter of the 5th of this month,
No. 1783. During this conversaton we declared to them that a celebration
of holy co mmunio n, as some of their members have celebrated it, even
presupposing all of them to be true Christians, could not be permitted at
all because, were such freedom to be extended them, even the most
depraved and vicious sect could demand the same, thereby necessarily
creating the greatest disorders. 37 For even if it is not written that only
the elder can extend the bread and the wine to the congregation, it is
nevertheless written: ‘Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for
the Lord’s sake’ (I Peter 2:13), and in this instance it means that only
the elder can extend the elements. They allowed themselves to be
corrected in this regard and, in the future, will no longer celebrate it in
this manner, as they have already promised the Lord Inspector on the
10th of February of this year. 38 As far as their dissociation from the
decadent church is concerned, we have urgently requested and earnestly
advised that they should return to the same, to which they have
responded with a written statement: [cf. b. below].
“Since all of us will surely be eager to oppose the decay of true
Christianity on the basis of the Holy Scriptures, it should be possible, in
consequence of this fellowship’s own statement signed by thirty-three of
its members, to conclude this matter in a different way. Blumenstein,
March 25, 1860. Johann Harder, elder.”
b) Statement of the Brethren.
"To the Church Council of Ohrloff and Halbstadt:
In conformity with the request, we here declare that, as we stated
in our letter of January 23 of this year to the honorable Area
Administrative Office, each of us would have preferred to have remained
in his own congregation. But because the ministers do not act in
accordance with God’s Word, as we also said in our letter of January 23
of this year, and are prepared to prove, we found ourselves forced to
secede from the church for the sake of our consciences and desire to
establish our own church on the basis of the Mennonite confession of
faith, as all other Mennonite congregations have.
“In response to the statement of the five elders of March 11 of this
year we answer:
240
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
1) “a. That the elders would not be able to prove to us that we
interpret the Holy Scriptures in a one-sided manner and take certain
passages out of context— and proofs from the Word of God that we do in
fact err, have not been provided to us by them as we requested, b. That
we do in fact recognize a church organization in accordance with the
Word of God can be clearly seen from our letter of January 6; but the
reason why we celebrated communion was that we did not find it sinful,
in God’s Word, to do so and could not celebrate it for conscience sake in
the company of unbelievers— drunkards
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…