← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 233 (not an original page number)
Unit 233 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
scipline. If they will pursue this goal, then 2), the consequences need
not be detrimental to the whole, and the single deviation in the fact that
they observed holy communion should be forgiven them. Everyone
who has learned to appreciate the mercy of God and the benevolent
toleration that we enjoy in this land will be prepared to do this
wholeheartedly. 3) The means to be used to dissuade these people from
their intention to establish a church of their own, is, that we all begin in
real earnest to act according to the Word of God, that the level of our
church discipline be raised, and the church be positively changed, for
which God in His grace grant us the power to will and to dol And if
anyone should show himself worthy of punishment, the church of Christ
serves him as standard and rule of conduct, as the Gospel of Christ
teaches: to separate him from the congregation and have nothing to do
with him until he becomes red with shame. This method always stands
the test if it is used in such a way that the Lord can acknowledge and
add His blessing to it. Should the conduct of a member of the
congregation challenge the arm of the law, however, we will remain
silent; for it does not bear the sword in vain, but is established to judge
the wicked and praise the good. Blumenstein, March 29, 1860.
Johann Harder, elder.”
11. Johann Claassen’s first Journey to St. Petersburg in Behalf of
the M.B. Church.
Since the threat of the local authorities constantly became more
alarming, Johann Claassen, with the agreement of only his wife, his
brother-in-law, Cornelius Reimer, and Br. Heinrich Huebert, suddenly
left for St. Petersburg in the night of March 27, riding as far as Kharkov.
By May 23, according to letters written in his own hand and a special
accounting regarding the expenses of the journey, he had again returned.
This was his first journey to St. Petersburg on behalf of the M.B.
Church. He had already been there in 1854 and 1857 on behalf of the
"Brotherhood School” in Gnadenfeld (#52). On April 19, 1866, Claassen
in historical retrospect, writes to the Kuban congregation from Tiflis
242
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
regarding the trip: . . I had accomplished little enough in St.
Petersburg; I saw only that our cause was everywhere a difficult one
and that I wanted to commend it to the Lord. When I had returned from
St. Petersburg, I advised the brothers and sisters to choose ministers;
only they should not elect us: Cornelssen, Koop and myself, because we
had signed the document [of February 10]. . .
XVI.
THE FIRST ELECTION OF MINISTERS BY THE M B. CHURCH
1. With the election of ministers the final organization (though not
the final “putting in order!”) of the M.B. Church had taken place. This
happened on May 30, 1860. The original election list in the hand of
Heinrich Huebert and Johann Claassen is extant in the archives of the
M.B. Church in Russia. (Cf. further #157: “Election List,” et
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…