Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 233 (not an original page number)

Unit 233 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
scipline. If they will pursue this goal, then 2), the consequences need not be detrimental to the whole, and the single deviation in the fact that they observed holy communion should be forgiven them. Everyone who has learned to appreciate the mercy of God and the benevolent toleration that we enjoy in this land will be prepared to do this wholeheartedly. 3) The means to be used to dissuade these people from their intention to establish a church of their own, is, that we all begin in real earnest to act according to the Word of God, that the level of our church discipline be raised, and the church be positively changed, for which God in His grace grant us the power to will and to dol And if anyone should show himself worthy of punishment, the church of Christ serves him as standard and rule of conduct, as the Gospel of Christ teaches: to separate him from the congregation and have nothing to do with him until he becomes red with shame. This method always stands the test if it is used in such a way that the Lord can acknowledge and add His blessing to it. Should the conduct of a member of the congregation challenge the arm of the law, however, we will remain silent; for it does not bear the sword in vain, but is established to judge the wicked and praise the good. Blumenstein, March 29, 1860. Johann Harder, elder.” 11. Johann Claassen’s first Journey to St. Petersburg in Behalf of the M.B. Church. Since the threat of the local authorities constantly became more alarming, Johann Claassen, with the agreement of only his wife, his brother-in-law, Cornelius Reimer, and Br. Heinrich Huebert, suddenly left for St. Petersburg in the night of March 27, riding as far as Kharkov. By May 23, according to letters written in his own hand and a special accounting regarding the expenses of the journey, he had again returned. This was his first journey to St. Petersburg on behalf of the M.B. Church. He had already been there in 1854 and 1857 on behalf of the "Brotherhood School” in Gnadenfeld (#52). On April 19, 1866, Claassen in historical retrospect, writes to the Kuban congregation from Tiflis 242 THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH regarding the trip: . . I had accomplished little enough in St. Petersburg; I saw only that our cause was everywhere a difficult one and that I wanted to commend it to the Lord. When I had returned from St. Petersburg, I advised the brothers and sisters to choose ministers; only they should not elect us: Cornelssen, Koop and myself, because we had signed the document [of February 10]. . . XVI. THE FIRST ELECTION OF MINISTERS BY THE M B. CHURCH 1. With the election of ministers the final organization (though not the final “putting in order!”) of the M.B. Church had taken place. This happened on May 30, 1860. The original election list in the hand of Heinrich Huebert and Johann Claassen is extant in the archives of the M.B. Church in Russia. (Cf. further #157: “Election List,” et

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…