← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 232 (not an original page number)
Unit 232 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
for example, c. In regard to c)
we are forced to declare that it is untrue that we consider ourselves the
only true Christians, and are ready to concede at any time that there can
be other true Christians known only to the Lord. That sentence, too, is
exaggerated which states that we declare the entire Mennonite
brotherhood to be enslaved by the devil; but the Lord forbid that we
should call evil, good and good, evil.
2) “We have no other major position nor do we seek to establish a
new religious society, but intend to live as Mennonites according to the
confession of our fathers in peaceful co-existence with others, which is
why no disorder need be feared. Nor do we seek to spread our opinions,
but it shall always be and remain our joy to lead disconsolate souls to
Christ.
3) “We have, as we have stated, no intention whatever to establish a
new religious society; nor were we admonished with love and earnestness
on the part of ministers from the Word of God, but were much more
threatened from the very beginning and dealt with on a judicial level. We
have not dissociated ourselves from the Mennonite brotherhood in our
letter of January 6, but only from the decadent churches.
“If the ministers would attempt to stem the tide of corruption within
the churches with all sincerity and in accordance with the Word of God,
we would be happy, even today, to set foot in them [in the document by
Johann Harder of March 24 one reads: ‘. . . join the same . . .’], assist
them and, with God’s gracious help, plant and help to build the
congregations. Given in Ohrloff this March 19, 1860.
“Ladekopp— David Claassen, Abraham Peters, Peter Stobbe. Lieb-
enau— Heinrich Huebert, Simon Harms, Johann Claassen. Waldheim—
Gottlieb Strauss, Johann Strauss, Friedrich Strauss, Johann Strauss,
David Doerksen. Gnadenfeld— Jakob Reimer, Heinrich Bartel, Bernhard
Penner. Rudnerweide— Jakob Becker, 39 Benjamin Becker, Abraham
Regehr. Pastva— Jakob Wall, Isaak Regehr, Andreas Voth. Berdiansk—
Wilhelm Bartel. Mariental— Diedrich Claassen. Elizabethtal— Isaak
Koop, Abraham Comelssen, Franz Klassen, Abraham Wiens, Cornelius
Wiens. Schardau— August Strauss, Daniel Hoppe, Heinrich Flaming,
Lichtfelde— Martin Klassen, Jakob Kroecker, Abraham Wiens." 40
The Struggle
241
c) Elder Johann Harder’s Second Statement.
“To the Molotschna Mennonite Area Administrative Office in
Halbstadt! As a supplement to our letter of March 25, we declare the
following, from the same position and point of view we established in the
above letter, concerning the Mennonites who have left our congregation:
1) The aspiration of these people finds expression in the desire to
establish their own church on the foundation and confession of all other
Mennonite churches, and in keeping with our highly esteemed religious
freedom, live according to their faith in the midst of the other churches
in the hope that thus they will be able to establish a better church
di
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…