← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 237 (not an original page number)
Unit 237 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ment, and if so, who, for
what reason, and how many times; and, 4) what kind of methods could be
employed to both hinder the spread and completely exterminate the
movement.” The brethren wrote:
“To the Supervisory Commission in Odessa:
“. . . We are not a newly arisen sect, as the illustrious Supervisory
Commission loves to call us, but are the seed of the imperishable Word of
God, which was preached to us by the apostles, explained by the Holy
Spirit, and at the same time are a fruit of the living faith of our beloved
progenitor Menno Simons, who held to the same church organization
and confession of faith as we do; consequently, we have the right to call
ourselves the truly genuine Mennonite family. . . .
“The reason why we did not write to our committee earlier is that
we knew our good name had already been considerably blackened; the
only thing we have left to add is that we do not necessarily detect a
negative attitude in the first three points of the above orders to our Area
Administrative Office, but detect at least this much in the (last) one that
it, 45 too, appears to be guilty of seeking means with which to eradicate
our fellowship. In response we say to you quite frankly that it is a futile
effort; for the leader of our fellowship is called Jesus Christ, highly to be
praised in all eternity, who has given us the promise: ‘No one shall pluck
you from my hand,’ and calls out to us: ‘Fear not, little flock; for it is
your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom’ (Luke 12:32). We
246
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
have confidently believed this till now and intend similarly to believe His
Word in the future, being determined, in case one no longer wishes to
permit us to do this, to give our life for it. But we still believe and are of
the conviction that the illustrious committee also knows something of
the injury done to and deterioration of the church and its members by
the Ohrloff ‘Barley Story’ 46 and the like (compare above #52(2]), and
how the elders and ministers, without cause, today live in disunity and
conflict with their members; and we do not believe that the illustrious
committee will condemn those to punishment or even consent to having
their name removed from the list of the colonists who believe and live
according to the Scriptures, who cannot be accused of any political
offence, and who, in contrast, live quiet lives; rather we believe, that as
much as lies in its power, it will take us under its protection. . . . Finally,
we would like to petition the illustrious committee, to scrutinize all the
documents beginning with no. 1, which have passed between us, the
elders, and the Area Administrative Office, in order to arrive at an
unequivocal conclusion. All of the documents are still available at the
local Area Administrative Office, in case they should not yet be in your
hands.
"And now we commend you and ourselves to God, to whom we
raise our hearts and hands,
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…