← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 238 (not an original page number)
Unit 238 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
petitioning Him for His gracious protection
who has also made us the following promise: ‘I am with you to the end
of the world’ (Matt. 28:20).
“Humbly signed by: Heinrich Huebert, minister, Wilhelm Bartel,
Jakob Reimer, August Strauss, Jakob Giesbrecht. Berdiansk, December
27, I860.’’
§99(2) 4. We are convinced that this petition made a strong impression
upon the Supervisory Commission. The threatening and deprecatory
tone, which pervaded the Commission’s paper of November 29, from now
on gave place to an impartial and conciliatory manner of speech in the
orders to the local colonial authorities. Meanwhile, those cool rays may
already have begun, which Privy Councillor Hahn (during Comies’ time
president of the Supervisory Commission), Claassen’s fatherly friend,
advisor and protector, from time to time directed toward the Commis-
sion. (Compare XXV.: “Documentary Supplement.”) The words:
"to give our life,” may sound like empty phrases today— they were not.
For Huebert, like Jung Stilling, Auberle, Philipp Paulus, Hof fmann and
others, was completely captivated by the Daniel-like apocalyptic
expectation of the immin ent end of the world and its mighty battles.
And although Huebert may not have sacrificed his life, he did sacrifice
his vigor and his all-too-frail health during the ten months he was
imprisoned in a mouldy, cold and wretched place. And Brother Abraham
Difficulties and Victory
247
Comelssen was driven out of the school in Elizabethtal and the colony
during the winter and was forced to live in a damp and chilly sod hut on
the Nogai steppes. Abraham Braun 47 of Grossweide, a “brother of the
Mennonite Church,” then a respected man and member of the
Gnadenfeld congregation, saved him and his family from fever and death
in that he dared to take the fugitives under his protection. The others
who wanted to move away in order to earn their bread in peace were
denied passes so that, as Reimer of Gnadenfeld wrote, “they would be
squeezed back into the church.”
5. To the above-mentioned order of the Supervisory Commission of §100
November 29, by way of the Area Administrative Office, to “the
honorable church Elder Johann Harder of Blumenstein,” the latter
answered in as courageous and manly a manner as had the “brethren”
(even though he was only one against five bishops and was opposed by
the five and all the powerful civil authorities):
“To the Area Administrative Office in Halbstadt:
After I have drawn in information regarding those Mennonites who
have seceded from our decadent [!] churches as a consequence of the
letter from the Area Administrative Office of the 14th of this month, I
report to it that only Heinrich Huebert of Liebenau from our
congregation belongs to them; as far as an answer to the second point is
concerned, I am, at this point, unable to say with any certainty who
currently exercises the greatest influence upon them. As far as the third
point is concerned, I be
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…