← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 242 (not an original page number)
Unit 242 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
the Promemoria attached to the
petition.
“The Molotschna Mennonites, in the Province of Taurida, base their
internal administration, in matters of faith and church discipline, upon
the Holy Gospel and the teaching of Menno Simons. The entire
Mennonite church order is rooted primarily in the principle: freedom of
conscience and of personal conviction. The Russian imperial law plainly
guarantees the Mennonites complete freedom of religion 52 and absolute-
ly avoids any kind of direct or indirect interference in the internal affairs
of the church and its discipline. The Mennonite Church Council, too, in
keeping with the teachings of the Gospel and Menno Simons, is, for its
part, supposed to avoid all matters that pertain to the secular
authorities, and to give to God the things that are God’s and to Caesar
the things that are Caesar’s. On the basis of these principles the
Difficulties and Victory
251
Molotschna Mennonites, quite apart from divisions in regard to civil
matters (in which context every colony also forms an independent
community), are also divided into separate congregations or fellowships
with respect to their church organization, each with its own ministers
and elders at its head. The actual difference between the latter and the
civil community, whose organization is determined by positive law,
consists in the fact that the church fellowship is built, not by means of
the law, but through the free decisions and in accordance with the
personal convictions of the fellow believers themselves, irrespective of
geographical, administrative or other factors which determine the
organization of a civil community. As a consequence, each ecclesiastical
community may embrace a more or less substantial number of
administrative communities; in contrast to this, however, every in-
dividual Mennonite— in the individual civil communities as well as in the
family— is completely free to join any particular ecclesiastical fellowship,
as the Molotschna Mennonite fellowships reveal. There can therefore be
no doubt about the personal right of every Mennonite either freely to
withdraw from a fellowship which does not conform to his convictions,
or, as the case may be, to help establish a new church— ah the more so
since the civil law does not address itself to this matter while the Holy
Scriptures and Menno Simons make it into a veritably unavoidable duty
for every true believer, in a given instance, to withdraw from such a
fellowship. Similarly, it follows that it is the right and obligation of the
church of expel its corrupt members— to ban them.
“On the basis of this very teaching the ‘Lichtenauer’ and the
so-called Kleine Gemeinde were established in Molotschna prior 53 to
1820. The first of these broke away from the Ohrloff congregation and, in
spite of the fact that the injustice was clearly on its side, now constitutes
a majority, while the so-called Kleine Gemeinde was made up of members
derived f
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…