← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 243 (not an original page number)
Unit 243 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
rom all other congregations, and, like our present congregation,
initially severely persecuted. Nevertheless, both are recognized and
continue to exist to this very day. . . [There follows the historical
presentation of the founding of the M.B. Church with documentation
derived from those documents known to us, and others. Cf. the complete
document below #159.]
11. In his already-cited study Unsere Kolonien, Privy Councillor A.
Klaus says the following concerning the outcome of this most humble
petition: . . The government . . . did not long delay [naturally after
extended investigations] in issuing a decree to the effect that these
church divisions should in no wise be accompanied by a restriction of
civil rights or persecution by the police authorities. . . [Compare
"Documentary Supplement,” #160d.]
§106
252
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
§107
12. Meanwhile, the ecclesiastical and civil battle progressed. We will
record only that in the documents which is most characteristic. Of
interest is the following letter of the later Minister Bernhard Harder to
the editor of the Mennonitische Blaetter, dated July 28, 1862.
"If you were in the vicinity, I would hasten to you for advice, for
tomorrow I am to preach on the Gospel text: ‘Beware of false prophets . . .’
but am still not able to discover any point of contact. I wonder why they
included a Gospel passage in the selected Bible readings that presents the
majority of preachers in such a poor light, in which most of them have to
preach their own death sentence. Yes, you see, that is how it is in our
midst. Fruits!— O God be merciful! We have exhibited fruits of which we
must be ashamed. Was it perhaps different at the time when one preached
consecutively through the gospels? Or did they deliberately want to give
the preacher an opportunity— in fact, force him— to preach to himself
occasionally? Too often, one leaves himself out of the picture. There are
those who fearfully adapt to the tastes and demands of the local
congregation, which certainly does not like the preacher to use the
second person address, but wants to hear ‘we’ and ‘us.’ A guest
preacher I myself heard, said, ‘The love for "us” brought me here (to
preach the Word of God to us).’ These often leave themselves out of the
picture when it comes to ferreting out the false prophets and the
ravenous wolves and showing them in the proper light. O may we all
honestly begin to pray: ‘Jesus, give us seeing eyes! etc.’ May we stop
hiding from ourselves, through real or imagined respect of office or
through the sheep’s clothing of hypocritical humility and respectability,
the false prophet and wolf in us. But life is so comfortable among these
false prophets. ‘Peace, peace, there is no danger.’ But— the fruits? O,
there is no peace, and thus also no fruit of righteousness, no fruit of the
Holy Spirit. Take note! The congregations of our people have become a
morass, and vapors are rising
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…