← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 247 (not an original page number)
Unit 247 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
the saints, I Cor. 14:33, 40. According to this divine
order, our Lord and Savior has, as Head of the Christian church and at
His glorious ascension, ordained or dedicated the twelve apostles to their
high and important office by the power of his high-priestly blessing, ten
days later completing their preparation for this service through the gift
of His Holy Spirit, Luke 24:50, 51; Matt. 28:20. By virtue of this office
which they had received, these apostles, ordained by the Lord Himself,
then from time to time founded congregations by ordaining elders and
bishops, etc., etc., for the believers of a given place, installing them in
their offices by the laying on of hands and command in the name of
Christ, that they might, as the servants of Christ and not in their own
willfulness, act as the servants and stewards of the divine mysteries and
administer the institutions founded by Christ as He instituted them.
256
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
Mark 3:14; Acts 1:15-26; and 14:23; I Cor. 4:1; Titus l:5ff.; II Tim. 1:6.
Since those who have seceded from us have quite arbitrarily— that is, in
contradiction to the regulations of our church based upon the
foregoing— appointed their leaders 57 without ecclesiastical ordination
and with equal arbitrariness [?] depose them from their offices, we
cannot recognize them as a Mennonite congregation allied with us.
Second: According to our apostolic church order, only the ordained
elders are authorized to administer the holy sacraments; marriages can
also be legally performed only by properly appointed ministers [in most
congregations of the time not ordained by the laying on of hands]. Since
the secessionists have neither a church-ordained elder nor a properly
appointed minister, and since they absolutely refuse to tie the teaching
ministry of the church and the administration of the sacraments to an
ecclesiastical office, but on the contrary have every member who feels
called to do so administer these ordinances [? why, then, did they elect
teachers and ministers?],— indeed, even the female members speak in
their meetings [but only in intimate home gatherings!] and pray
aloud— obviously in contradiction to I Cor. 12; II Cor. 5:18-20; James
3:1; I Cor. 14:34, 35 and I Tim. 2:12— therefore, according to the rules of
our church, we can neither condone nor recognize as legal such
unauthorized practices of theirs as baptism, communion and marriage.
Thirdly: Finally, the secessionists have demonstrated sufficiently both
by the disorderly and tumultuous manner in which they conduct their
so-called devotional meetings, their abuse of holy baptism— in that they
rebaptize, and that indeed even several times [?], persons who have
already been baptized upon their own request and confession of faith, as
though the Lord God could perjure Himself— as well as in the burning of
recognized Christian books of sermons and devotional literature that
they have nothing in common with
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…