← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 248 (not an original page number)
Unit 248 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
the Mennonite congregations. For all
of these matters have no basis whatever either in our confessional
statements or the Holy Scriptures. Since the religious freedom promised
us was confirmed in the first paragraph of the ‘letter of privileges’ so
graciously granted the Mennonites of Southern Russia, according to
which we may without hindrance practice our traditional principles of
faith, we consider ourselves bound by office, duty and conscience— as
much as we pity those who have gone astray— to adhere to our
declaration as given above until they, having honestly recognized and
regretted their errors, wifi once again seek reinstatement in our
Mennonite brotherhood and traditional apostolic church organization.
The conference at Gnadenfeld, December 15, 1864. The Church Elders.”
The signatures are missing. The copy in our possession is written in
Minister Franz Isaak’s hand and carried the following inscription:
“Received from the Minister Franz Isaak as authentic in the spring of
1896. David Schellenberg [elder of the M.B. Church of Rueckenau in the
Difficulties and Victory
257
Molotschna]. Compare #4e, footnote, and #75a and footnote; cf. also
“The Office of Elder in the M.B. Church,” # 96 and #62(2): “List of
Elders of the Mennonite Church Congregations”; also the footnote to the
preceding “e” in #708. One should note that, as before, in their position
taken in principle, their tone and style had become absolutely dignified,
impartial and truly theological. What was the reason for this?
14. Meanwhile, Claassen had returned from St. Petersburg on June §109
30, 1862, furnished with a passport from the St. Petersburg police upon
the intercession of Senator Hahn and the Ministry of Crown Lands
which, as the highest authority for all the settlers, provided him with
passports for one-and-a-half years. (The original is still extant.) At one
point, when Claassen in fear showed the gentlemen of the ministry a
letter from the Area Administrative Office (the original is also extant; cf.
#759e), in which they threatened to have him brought home like a
vagabond without a passport and under police escort, they broke out into
a gay and resounding laughter, quite conclusively proved to him that the
pass from their ministry was much more authoritative than the one from
the Molotschna Mennonite Area Administrative Office, and emphatically
assured him that he would return to his home a “free man.” Claassen,
however, who had really believed “that it could come to this,” returned
to his quarters and on his knees gave hearty thanks to his beloved
Savior. Moreover, on his return journey Claassen had in his possession a
sealed package from Count Muraviov, the Minister of War, which he was
to deliver personally to Count Evdokimov, the General of the Army in
the Caucasus. All of this impressed the people of the Molotschna.
Nevertheless, Claassen and the brethren were only given passes upon the
direct order from St
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…