← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 249 (not an original page number)
Unit 249 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
. Petersburg; and even then, in order to receive his
passport, the Area Administrative Office, in order to irritate him, made
him come from Liebenau to Halbstadt six times (at a distance of
approximately 22 versts one way, or a total of approximately 264
versts!). The letter from the Minister of War, with which Claassen and
the brethren travelled to the Caucasus in the fall of 1862, enabled the
Molotschna and Chortitza brethren to establish the currently flourishing
settlements of Wohldemfuerst and Alexanderfeld— now Velikokniashesk
and Alexandrodar— of 1864-66 in the Kuban. (Claassen’s activities in St.
Petersburg and the settlement in the Kuban are described in greater
detail in XXV.: “Documentary Supplement.”)
15. The Question regarding Marriage in the Molotschna M.B. §110
Church
a) The circular mentioned in Harder’s document of December 24,
1863, shows how everyone was concerned to inflict pain and dishonor upon
258
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
the M.B. Church after the government had forced the local authorities to
issue passports and remove the civil restrictions. The question of
marriage, which this circular treats in such an offensive manner, was
conclusively settled in the Molotschna only around 1865 and later, after
David Friesen had stepped down from office and Franz Dyck of
Blumenort and Cornelius Toews of Tiege (who died as a member of the
M.B. Church), both members of the Ohrloff congregation, had become
the colony administrators.
b) The fine circular to the village mayors reads as follows:
“Since some among the so-called joyous brethren, in spite of the
order issued against them, not to undertake any ecclesiastical acts until
their newly-formed sect should be recognized 58 by the authorities and
our entire Council of Elders, continue to baptize and perform marriages, 59
the Area Administrative Office orders the village offices not to
recognize these marriages as valid or in any way to view the persons,
living in this kind of unchastity, as a family. 60 On the contrary, each
member is to remain on his original family register and the illegitimately-
born children are to be appended to the family register of the respective
female persons. Since dubious opinions regarding the foregoing matter
have arisen in some of the village offices, the Area Administrative Office
orders the village offices to enforce the order as given above and to keep
correct copies of the same on hand. The Area Administrative Office at
Halbstadt, December 7, 1863. No. 12652. Colony Administrator Friesen.”
c) The Brethren replied energetically in a presentation which had
been inserted into the Promemoria of a petition to the Ministry of Crown
Lands of December 30, 1863. (Cf. further #175(2).) The Brethren wrote:
". . . Marriages take place in the Lord according to the Word of God, as
can also be seen from article 10 of the Confession of Faith 61 of the
Anabaptist-Mennonite churches concerning holy matrimo
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…