← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 272 (not an original page number)
Unit 272 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
llowing a long famine. When a
parched and starving flock of sheep suddenly has too good a pasture and
too abundant a water supply, it is the shepherd’s chief concern not to let
the flock graze and drink as much as it desires, or most of them will
perish (see long “Note” to “June Reform,” #J9i[2J). Believers who come
from death to life in this m ann er readily want to make a system out of
the exceptional form they experienced. A great many perversions of this
type can be traced to Methodism, which has been so wholesome for the
renewal of English-speaking churches and world evangelism. Its
legitimate daughter is the “Salvation Army” with its eccentric ritual,
about which, though we feel extremely antipathetic toward its external
manner, we dare not make any negative comment, because this church
fellowship has done phenomenal good and has had outstanding spiritual-
moral-social success “in its area,” primarily the populace of large cities.
f) Unger continues: In the colony of Einlage there were also several
persons who had earlier come to assurance through the reading of Holy
Scripture and now began to make contact with those from Kronsweide.
“But the sly evil one already had his eye on that small flock of believers.
These believed that they had the serpent already under their feet; they
were completely inexperienced and did not think of temptation; some got
the idea that anything that came to their mind was of God, and that God
would not permit anything that would harm His children,” and similar
statements.
g) Heinrich Epp continues the report: Since the above-named
forerunner of this revival J.L., had no one who was his equal spiritually
in leading the flock, other than a one-time minister of the Kronsweide
church, J.J., who had fallen into error and had therefore been deposed
from his office, the latter also misled J.L., and through him led several
others into the same delusion. They perverted Scripture: To the clean,
everything is clean. Thus I am not doing it, but the sin which abides in
me, does it— and other similar (passages), so that they believed they
were doing the will of God in everything. Thus they also fell into sins of
The Einlage M.B. Church
283
the flesh. They were revealed and received [due] ecclesiastical and civil
punishment. This “strong meat,’’ as the misled ones called their heresy,
was not made known to all believers, and many remained undefiled by
that sin. “Yet the whole fellowship, the innocent along with the guilty,
were steeped in the same lye and banned by the church,” 1855. After
several weeks they were reinstated, according to custom, and now they
and the ones from Einlage were most strongly forbidden to hold “any
religious meetings” outside the church [because these meetings were
hated and regarded as the root of the evil. Instead, they should have
been put under wise leadership, as in Brenkenhofswalde, during its time,
cf. 1145-48 above: "Gnadenfeld.” But the min
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…