Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 272 (not an original page number)

Unit 272 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
llowing a long famine. When a parched and starving flock of sheep suddenly has too good a pasture and too abundant a water supply, it is the shepherd’s chief concern not to let the flock graze and drink as much as it desires, or most of them will perish (see long “Note” to “June Reform,” #J9i[2J). Believers who come from death to life in this m ann er readily want to make a system out of the exceptional form they experienced. A great many perversions of this type can be traced to Methodism, which has been so wholesome for the renewal of English-speaking churches and world evangelism. Its legitimate daughter is the “Salvation Army” with its eccentric ritual, about which, though we feel extremely antipathetic toward its external manner, we dare not make any negative comment, because this church fellowship has done phenomenal good and has had outstanding spiritual- moral-social success “in its area,” primarily the populace of large cities. f) Unger continues: In the colony of Einlage there were also several persons who had earlier come to assurance through the reading of Holy Scripture and now began to make contact with those from Kronsweide. “But the sly evil one already had his eye on that small flock of believers. These believed that they had the serpent already under their feet; they were completely inexperienced and did not think of temptation; some got the idea that anything that came to their mind was of God, and that God would not permit anything that would harm His children,” and similar statements. g) Heinrich Epp continues the report: Since the above-named forerunner of this revival J.L., had no one who was his equal spiritually in leading the flock, other than a one-time minister of the Kronsweide church, J.J., who had fallen into error and had therefore been deposed from his office, the latter also misled J.L., and through him led several others into the same delusion. They perverted Scripture: To the clean, everything is clean. Thus I am not doing it, but the sin which abides in me, does it— and other similar (passages), so that they believed they were doing the will of God in everything. Thus they also fell into sins of The Einlage M.B. Church 283 the flesh. They were revealed and received [due] ecclesiastical and civil punishment. This “strong meat,’’ as the misled ones called their heresy, was not made known to all believers, and many remained undefiled by that sin. “Yet the whole fellowship, the innocent along with the guilty, were steeped in the same lye and banned by the church,” 1855. After several weeks they were reinstated, according to custom, and now they and the ones from Einlage were most strongly forbidden to hold “any religious meetings” outside the church [because these meetings were hated and regarded as the root of the evil. Instead, they should have been put under wise leadership, as in Brenkenhofswalde, during its time, cf. 1145-48 above: "Gnadenfeld.” But the min

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…