← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 273 (not an original page number)
Unit 273 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
isters lacked the insight
and capability to do it.]
2. The "Brotherhood” in Einlage.
a) Unger writes: The Einlage brethren certainly didn’t want to
believe that such a state of affairs would be reached by the children of
God, and defended the brethren of Kronsweide, until, unfortunately, they
were forced to see the painful truth. Thus the Einlage brethren had been
painfully deceived. Yet they soon met again and began to conduct prayer
and mission study meetings, for which they obtained permission from the
Chortitza elder on the condition that they would not “proselytize.” They
obtained and read mission periodicals, and amassed an annual offering of
100 rubles or more, with contributions from eight to ten families.
b) According to H. Epp and A. Unger, these beginnings took place
some five years after the tragic incident in Kronsweide, i.e. 1859/60. The
founders of these mission and prayer meetings were Heinrich Neufeld,
Abraham Unger [compare his letter of June 15, 1861, #115 above] and
Cornelius Unger. God granted an increase in the meetings. Among other
items, the Einlage brethren read the Missionsblaetter der Gemeinde
getaufter Christen (Missionary Periodical of the Church of Baptized
Christians) [Hamburg Baptists]. This raised two crucial issues for Br.
Unger: secession and baptism. [It is remarkable that until June, 1861,
there is no trace of any connection between these brethren and those of
the Molotschna.] Brother Heinrich Neufeld was not disturbed by the
question of baptism, but Br. Unger wrote to Oncken [the founder of the
Hamburg Baptist Church], who also answered.
c) Brother Aron Lepp, elder of the Einlage M.B. Church in
Andreasfeld, wrote the following for the “History of Our M.B. Church” in
1884: My conversion took place in 1857 and 1858. I began to lead a
moral life. I received the impetus from my dear friends David and
Heinrich Goertz [members of the Gnadenfeld congregation, who, along
with the narrator, served as supervisors of the Hebrew colonies in the
§128
284
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
§129
Kherson District]. Since I could cultivate no fellowship with Christian
friends, I used Friedrich Starke’s Handbuch for our personal edification
and sought to improve my life according to its instruction, but did not
find satisfaction therein. In 1857 I visited the brethren Peter Friesen,
Johann Loewen and Cornelius Hiebert, who were already living in
Chortitza at the time, and heard them tell the story of their conversion.
Then I saw the light. From then on I sought knowledge and the
salvation of my soul and prayed about it to God. And thus it pleased the
dear Lord, through the mediation of Hofacker’s sermons, to bring about
a new creation in me. “O the blessed hours that Jesus provides when one
remembers only the wounds of the Lamb!” It was in 1858 when the great
change took place in my heart. I was overjoyed until I read the sixth
chapter of Romans. There I found that I la
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…