← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 283 (not an original page number)
Unit 283 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Ukowallians (see above #166 and below, point i), the “strictest
followers of Menno” (Ramseyer, according to Blaupot ten Cate),
practiced immersion primarily about 1650, along with pouring. In the
year 1790 in Leeuwarden, Friesland, contrary to the wishes of many
members, the basin for the imm ersion form of baptism was removed
from the church of the Frisian Mennonites by the elder with the aid of
the government.
i 1 ) Blaupot ten Cate, one of the best informed and impartial
Mennonite historians, writes in Geschiedenis der Doopsgezinden in
Friesland, p. 162, concerning the group of Old Flemish: “1) They had the
same confession of faith as Menno and Dirk Philips concerning the
incarnation of Christ (see #5h). 2) They re-baptized everyone who joined
their church, even those who had already been baptized on confession of
294
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
their faith. As a rule this was done by immersion. 3.) They were very
firm about using the ‘ban,’ especially in cases of mixed marriages.
4) They were distinguishable by great simplicity of dress and external
things; herein they were similar to the Old Frisians. 5) Ordination of
elders and ministers was performed by laying on of hands; the whole
congregation had to recognize this ordination, and the candidate was
obligated to accept this service unless he was notoriously incapable of
doing so. 6) They practiced footwashing before communion. [According
to some other sources, many churches practiced it only on fellow
believers from a distance visiting in their homes.] Several of these
principles were dropped during the course of the century ....
Immersion was no longer practiced in Norden in 1710.” This same
historian reports that they considered their own Mennonite Church as
the only church of Christ, and that the church was correct in not
recognizing anyone outside their pale as a brother in Christ. Only elders
and ministers were allowed to speak at meetings [1689]. The elders alone
[not the ordinary ministers] were permitted to administer baptism and
communion.
j) In the Surhuisterveen Mennonite Church in Friesland (still in
existence), according to Ramseyer, the historian Blaupot ten Cate was
shown an open spot in the forest where Swiss Mennonites who had fled
to Holland performed baptism by immersion about 1720.
k) Between 1600 and 1800 there existed in Holland and Northwest
Germany, according to Meusel’s Kirchliches Handlexicon I, 129, the
Rhynsburger 94 "Brethren” or “Collegiants” (congregationalists) who
continued in Menno’s teachings; they were also called “Tunkers,” i.e.
“Dompelaars” (compare above #9c and 13n). They practiced baptism
only by immersion; however, depending on the understanding of those
concerned, they also accepted members into their fellowship without
baptism on faith. Frequently their baptisms (according to Blaupot ten
Cate in Ramseyer, p. 410) were carried out by Mennonite ministers (from
whom they very likely had re
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…