← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 284 (not an original page number)
Unit 284 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ceived the first baptism: from whom else?).
Thus the well-known Utrecht professor, Van Geuns, and also Adrian
Houttuyn of Hoom used to baptize in Rhynsburg. Tersteegen
fellows hipped with them also: it was an Alliance Church as we call it
today.
k ) We cannot help but point out here what we have already said
above (#9c and 13n) that the English Baptists branched off from the
Anabaptists of the Netherlands, and this in two lines. The first line:
John Smyth (died 1611), formerly a priest in the Anglican Church, went
to Holland because of persecution and joined the Mennonites in
Amsterdam. He baptized Thomas Helwyth (-ysse, -ys). The latter formed
an English Baptist church in Amsterdam which returned to London in
Baptism by Immersion
295
1611 and published a confession of faith. Contrary to Smyth and to the
Mennonites, they declared military service and the oath as permissible
for the Christian. The controversial question whether J. Smyth
“baptized himself” (which is hardly thinkable as "he had joined the
Mennonites”), or whether “he was baptized by the Mennonites” (the
most natural thing to do), and whether he baptized Thomas Helwyth by
pouring or immersion remains undecided to this day. But before long
this church baptized exclusively by immersion. This is the mother church
of the English General Baptists, that is, of the anti-Calvinist Baptists.
The second line: “The honor of having started the first organized
Independent Church 95 in England belongs to the Minister Henry Jakob
who, in 1616, returned to London from Holland where he had fled for a
while because of persecution." From this strongly Calvinistic Inde-
pendent Church (believing in predestination) a group of brethren
and sisters separated and were released in love and peace in 1633 because
they believed that baptism by immersion was the only biblical form of
baptism upon faith. However, the newly-constituted church did not know
of any “pure” church in England, i.e. pure in Calvinistic doctrine, that
practiced this form of baptism. Its first minister was John Spillsbury. So
Richard Blount (Blunt) was sent to Holland. He was received in a
friendly manner in Rhynsburg and was baptized by Jan Batte. That was
in 1640. (It should be noted that the Rhynsburgers were certainly not
strongly Calvinistic! N.B. In Rhynsburg baptism was performed by
laying the hands on the candidate’s head as he knelt in the water with
arms crossed over his chest, and by slowly immersing him three times
while the sacramental words were spoken. Ramseyer, p. 408.) In London,
Richard Blount first of all baptized the Minister Samuel Blacklock; later
fifty-three persons were baptized, including John Spillsbury. This is the
parent church of the Particular Baptists, i.e., the strictly Calvinistic
Baptists. The larger parts of these two denominations in England have
long ago united in the extremely tolerant Baptist Union. Therefore the
“Organized Independent Church,” as w
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…