← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 306 (not an original page number)
Unit 306 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
r, son of Henry, age 37, born in
the colony of Einlage and into the Mennonite religion, still live there. Wife
Catherine [other matters concerning the family). I have never been judged
nor investigated before.
“2) Asked concerning the matter under dispute, I, like the other
members of our congregation, give notice that I recognize the Mennonite
confession of faith as it is set up in the Mennonite catechism [NB! J. I, like
Heinrich Neufeld, Gerhard Wieler and Peter Berg, have not concocted a
new teaching or formed a new sect; ratherl, like Heinrich Neufeld, together
with a number of other Mennonites, have come to the realization that the
elders in the colonies of the Chortitza District do not live up to the
Mennonite confession of faith. Thereupon we spoke to the elders,
Hardships at Einlage
317
requesting that they reinstitute the Mennonite customs ; but these declared
that to be impossible. We thereupon felt compelled to elect our own
ministers from our midst, in accordance with the Mennonite rights. As a
result, Heinrich Neufeld and I were elected and subsequently baptized in
the river Tokmak near the Molotschna by Gerhard Wieler, who had been
commissioned to perform this act by the local ministers. This teaching we
draw from the Word of God and the teachings of our reformer, Menno
Simons, who is the founder of the same, and call ourselves Mennonite
brethren [NB!j.
“Our teaching differs in that we put into practice the Mennonite
confession, while you allow the teaching to be corrupted and practice it only
partially.
“We fully recognize ecclesiastical customs; we allow marriage; it is
binding for one’s entire life; the marriage ceremony is performed by the
minis ter after the couple to be married has reached the right age.
“Holy communion is distributed by the elders and the minis ters. It
consists of bread and wine; in accordance with the word of the Lord, the
bread is broken as the body of Christ and distributed, the same is done with
the wine as the blood of Christ. Only those are allowed access to the service
who can prove, by word and by deed, that they are true disciples of Christ.
“Baptism is performed by us only through submersion in water, and
that only on such persons as have made a contrite confession of their sins
and have found forgiveness for their sins in the blood of Jesus Christ.
“If someone blasphemes the teachings of Christ and returns to a life of
sin, he will not be helped by his former forgiveness and is excluded from our
fellowship.
“According to the Word of God and Menno’s teachings, 117 we cannot
accept the pouring that occurs in the corrupt Mennonite Church as a valid
form of baptism; because of this we do not rebaptize but rather only
baptize;
“The number of baptized Mennonites is 76 male and female souls, who
have all freely requested baptism and live in the colonies of the Chortitza
District. I represent one such person. No one of Russian descent has
joine
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…