← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 307 (not an original page number)
Unit 307 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
d us.
“This conviction I shall retain
As long as earth shall hold me;
This I shall think, do, and pursue
As long as I can move. Amen.”
[According to a note in Abraham Unger’s Diary, Brother J. Isaak
was also taken to account here.]
318
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
§ 142 5. Arrest of the Leading Brethren and the Attempts to Take Colonial
Status from the Secessionists. Br. Heinrich Epp relates: a) . . After
being dealt with thus [at the hearing], they returned to their homes for two
days, with a premonition that there was more to come. More came. The local
authorities took the brethren Neufeld and Unger by night and brought
them to the Chortitza Mennonite Area A dminis trative Office jail where
they were confined in a room with covered windows so that they would be
unable to read [!]. From here they were taken on May 10, 1862, to the
assistant chief of police. He had them taken into the Russian village of
Tschemyschevo and placed under guard. The inhabitants were curious,
however, and observed that they conducted worship services. They asked
them why they were being kept in custody. The brethren were happy to let
them know that it was on account of Christ and their faith that they were
prisoners. The brethren were grateful that they were being kept under
tolerant Russian authorities. Since their guards soon realized that they
would make no attempt to flee, they were given permission to go out at
night to a village 10 versts distant where they could buy themselves some
food. In this manner they were detained for seven weeks, though not in a
prison. Instead, they were allowed to move about freely and talk about
God’s Word, which they did. Although the village was 50 versts away [from
Einlage], the journey was frequently made; those who came to the faith at
home went there to be baptized, and so the small flock grew. After seven
weeks had passed, on June 26, the brethren returned home, b) While the
brethren Gerhard Wieler and Johann Claassen stayed on in St. Petersburg,
our church was ordered back to the Area Administrative Office where we
were once again asked to explain what we intended to do. To this we
responded: ‘We will wait to find out what the brethren in St. Petersburg
are able to accomplish, and whatever decision the government makes con-
cerning us we will accept. This gave them something to reflect upon and
once again they allowed us to return home. Since the brethren remained
steadfast in the teachings of Christ, still another decree was drafted—
which was intended to deprive them of their status as colonists.’ The Area
Administrative Office announced in all the villages that their church status
was to be withdrawn.” [Nevertheless, this too bore no fruit. Compare
#108,d.]
§ 143 6. Most humble petition to His Majesty, the Tsar, by Gerhard Wieler.
[German translation available in the archives of the Einlage M.B. Church]:
“Your Royal Majesty!
“Most Serene Monarch!
a) “With deep
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…