← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 308 (not an original page number)
Unit 308 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
est reverence and childlike submission, the under-
signed, commissioned by his fellow-believers, dares to approach you, O
Hardships at Einlage
319
Lord find Tsar, on their behalf, and humbly pray for your gracious answer
to our united plea.
b) “The reason is oppression, mistreatment (and constant persecution)
because of our faith. Already for some years, a number of persons in the
Chortitza and Kronsweide Mennonite Church in the province and district of
Ekaterinoslav were awakened by God’s Spirit through intensive reading of
the Scriptures to a better life and conduct. Recently, after they were fully
convinced of the moral and religious decay of their fellow Mennonites, they
began to order their lives in strict accordance with the Word of God and the
teaching of the reformer Menno Simons, at the same time keeping in mind
the rights and privileges granted to the Mennonites in South Russia by
the most gracious rulers of Russia.
c) ‘‘But our church elders, instead of promoting this work of the Lord, in
spite of their being fully convinced that only the Word of God and true fear
of the Lord can make citizens faithful and obedient, began to arouse an
irreconcilable hatred against us in their congregations. This hatred and the
unrighteous acts stemming from it, provoked us to use the rights due us
according to God’s Word and Menno Simons’ teaching, which consist
herein: Every Mennonite not only has the liberty, but rather, in the case at
hand, the unalterable obligation to leave a Mennonite church that does not
conform to his convictions and his conscience, and to join another, or to help
organize a new Mennonite church, to which the Russian state law makes no
reference whatever. And thus a new Mennonite church, consisting of 91
persons was established, which, according to the custom of their forefathers
(who came to their new fatherland with the reputation of being a pious,
God-fearing people), now conducted its worship services under the
leadership of its ministers, Heinrich Neufeld and Abraham Unger. Now we
began to experience severe persecution by our own local Mennonite
authorities (the Chortitza Area Administrative Office) in that they
oppressed and mistreated us, as the facts in the attached Promemoria
prove.
“In our distress, wherein we anxiously look for speedy help, webring our
united plea before your exalted throne, O Lord and Tsar, and pray for your
most gracious protection in the practice of our evangelical worship and for
the cessation of the severe persecutions on the part of the local government
administration, in order to be able to live a peaceful and quiet life in all
godliness and sobriety. The original signed: Mennonite of the Chortitza
Colony, Gerhard Wieler, Province and District of Ekaterinoslav, Chortitza
Mennonite District. St. Petersburg, June 4, 1862.”
e) “ Promemoria regarding the persecutions in the province and
district of Ekaterinoslav, of the Mennonites in the Chort
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…