← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 311 (not an original page number)
Unit 311 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
see fit to exile them, and
that they would completely renounce all their rights. The above-named
persons refused to sign.
j) “The Molotschna M.B. Church in the Province of Taurida, which
shares a fate similar to that of the Chortitza Brethren, had requested
protection from the Supervisory Commission for Foreign Settlers 120 in
vain. Therefore they felt compelled to send the Mennonite Johann Claassen
322
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
§144
to St. Petersburg to file further complaints with the Ministry of Crown
Lands. But this, too, achieved no disposition of the matter because the
Supervisory Commission, despite repeated orders from the ministry, has
not answered for the period of a whole year; meanwhile the suppressions in
the Molotschna and Chortitza Districts persist nevertheless.
k) “This circumstance prompted the new church (in Chortitza) to
send the Mennonite Gerhard Wieler from their midst to St. Petersburg
with the mandate to seek the protection of the most gracious father of our
country. During his [Wieler’s] stay in St. Petersburg, the Chortitza Area
Administrative Office continues its illegal actions, which are also contrary
to God’s Word, by dispatching both of the ministers of the church, Neufeld
and Unger, according to a telegram, to the chief of police in the Province
and District of Ekaterinoslav. The original is signed: The Mennonite
Gerhard Wieler from the Chortitza Colony. June 4, 1862.”
l) Br. Wieler returned from St. Petersburg at the same time as Br.
Claassen, at the end of June, 1862.
7. The Leading Brethren in the Jail for Criminal Investigation. In his
diary, Abraham Unger records: a) “On July 12, 1862, we— Abraham
Unger, Heinrich Neufeld, Gerhard Wieler and Peter Berg— were
transported with police escort to Ekaterinoslav by order of the
investigating judge, Mr. Schmigaila, from Nikopol. There we were handed
over to the district [criminal] judge, who wanted to release us if we
were willing to pay. Since we refused this course, we were taken from there
to the police. Here they took down our names, questioned us briefly and
took us to the Ostrog [prison], which we reached at sundown. The iron gate
opened to us, the soldiers locked it behind us again and took us to the
superintendent. He was a sympathetic man who did not want to throw us
into a common jail; therefore he gave an order that we should be taken first
into the school for the prisoners. It was dark and since the nobility [among
the prisoners] had taken possession of all the cells there was no room.
(Before this happened, we had been visited by the soldiers, however.) On the
trip to this place we had had the privilege of proclaiming the gospel and
had been quite happy. But now that we had arrived at this ‘kingdom,’
composed largely of robbers— doors barred behind us, hearing the clanking
of chain-laden people, surrounded by awe-inspiring buildings with their
barred windows and foul smells— all of this made a
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…