← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 314 (not an original page number)
Unit 314 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
EIR WAY INTO THE EINLAGE M B. CHURCH— ITS
SUPPRESSION— THE KUBAN SETTLEMENT DISCREDITED.
OLD DANZIG
1. "I must confess to my sorrow,” complains Brother Heinrich Epp §145
in his “Reports” of 1884, “what took place within the congregation. When
the brethren Neufeld, Unger, Gerhard Wieler and Peter Berg returned
from prison, the entire congregation came together desiring to learn what
they had experienced and to hear what had happened to them. But what
did we perceive? These men were not united in their understanding of the
gospel! ” The other three could not agree with Wieler. Since Brother Wieler
was eloquent and highly respected, he eventually won Brother Neufeld to
his point of view. And since Neufeld too was highly regarded and clearly a
gifted man, almost the entire congregation was won over to their side.
“Now they fell from one error into another. Young women were not allowed
to appear in public without caps (bonnets), even at their weddings, 121
giving other Mennonites occasion to ridicule them.” They were not allowed
to hang pictures or wall mottos on their walls ; these were burned. Even the
pictures in Christian books were destroyed. Hofacker’s Sermons, Arndt's
True Christianity and many other books were burned as well [cf. #120], "an
errorof which this writer [Heinrich Epp] was also guilty." Unger and a few
other brethren, however, did not go along. Since Gerhard Wieler was the
originator of this view [in the Einlage congregation], we soon came to
realize that we had been misled: the very thing that he had strenuously
forbidden, he had himself done [while in St. Petersburg, he had himself
photographed]. Despite all this, the number of believers grew and a sizeable
number were added to the church.
2. “The church at that time found itself on a slippery path. Unger §146
alone continued to stand firm with a few families. When he realized that he
could not accomplish anything, he resigned as a minister, an action he later
came to regret.” This state of affairs dragged on until the second holiday of
Christmas, 1864. “At that point Neufeld and Gerhard Wieler flung an
ultimatum at us, in these terms: ‘Whoever takes sides with Unger, can no
longer be brother to us.’ ” “As a result, several families were
excommunicated, specifically, the father of G.W., Johann Wieler, and his
sons Johann and Franz Wieler, Abraham Unger, Heinrich Epp [the writer
of the “Reports”], Cornelius Hiebert, Jacob Koslowsky, Peter Berg. [These
were joined by others and Unger’s group soon formed the larger body.] The
Neufeld-Wieler group seemed to “go from that point into uninhibited sound
and fury.” They read the Word of God selectively; taking, for instance,
325
326
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
§147
Jeremiah 41:4 (should read 31:4): “And shall go forth in the dance of the
merrymakers,”; and Philippians 4:4 : “Rejoice in the Lord always ; again I
will say, Rejoice.” “Clap your hands, all peoples! Shout to God w
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…