← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 315 (not an original page number)
Unit 315 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ith loud
songs of joy,” Psalm 47:1. This was the manner in which they conducted
their meetings [in quite the same manner we have seen earlier in the
Molotschna]. “They did not allow any sermons, and yet they praised God
and th ank ed Him.” However, even this fell more and more by the wayside,
and “eventually their meetings were little more than a time of
entertainment; they played and danced until they were soaked with sweat.”
"Yet they were to have nothing to do with the excommunicated [of Unger’s
group] it was said. These “children of God” treated the excommunicated in
exactly the same manner as the children of this world had earlier treated
them. They obeyed the Scripture passage, “Salute no one on the road (Luke
10:4)” to the letter, with the result that many who felt close to the brethren
were turned away. And finally at a church business meeting in Einlage, the
two ministers [they called themselves apostles] Gerhard Wieler and
Benj amin Becker pronounced the ban upon one another. Each wanted to be
the greatest. [However, they were soon reconciled and continued to exercise
their domination jointly.]
3. The false teaching [of the “Exuberants”] was brought to us from
the Molotschna brethren by G. Wieler and B. Becker, and from the
Molotschna also came our help. It became clear to Brother Johann Claassen
that the direction was quite wrong. Claassen came to Einlage and talked to
the brethren in error, telling them that their path was not the right one.
Since Claassen was a gifted and respected man, his words made a powerful
impression upon these brethren. Yet, they could not immediately accept
what he said and so a few of them drove to the Molotschna to ask advice of
the brethren of their movement. These had, however, already confessed
their errors. That left the “exuberants” of Einlage with little choice but to
confess that they too were in the wrong. “We have done evil,” they said.
“Shame has been brought upon the people of God before the world!”
[Merely before the “world?”!] The world exulted and said: “Did we not tell
you?” The Minister Neufeld came to see that he had allowed himself to be
misled by false brethren and that he had himself misled the church. 122
Thus, in the late summer and fall of the year 1865, the congregation came
together to confess that the “frenzy and dancing” [and that rough
treatment accorded dissenters and unbelievers] had been wrong, and
decided to direct its steps onto another path.
[Brother G. Wieler was at that time again in prison in Ekaterinoslav,
this time because of baptizing Russian people, and after his quick return
was not in agreement with the new order of things. Compare above #126,
June, 1865, Minutes, as well as #191, “Supplementary Documents.”]
Local Councils against Einlage
327
4. During the time when the congregation lay so wretchedly prostrate, § 148
the government granted the brethren permission to establish a settlement
in the Kuban region (M
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…