← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 331 (not an original page number)
Unit 331 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
to the Area Administrative
Office’s call to the elders to confer with their congregations in order to gain
their consent to exclude us from the status of colonist— we were forced
to seek further counsel. ...”
b) Johann Claassen, letter of April 19, 1866. “. . . On October 31,
I860, I, together with Br. Forchhammer, set off by post for St.
Petersburg from Liebenau by way of Berdiansk. ...”
c) Otto Forchhammer: “Moscow, November 18, 1860. Beloved
brethren! Hallelujah, Christ! even in Moscow and all the world.
Ebenezer! Hitherto hath the Lord helped us. On the day on which we
took our leave from the beloved Wilhelm Bartel, we travelled beyond
Mariopol, but had the misfortune to tip the wagon enroute in the
darkness, whereby a hoop of the wagon hood was damaged [of Claassen’s
own covered buggy which then had to be left in Moscow and sold]. The
Documentary Supplements
345
journey from Mariopol to Bachmut was a miserable one, for no horses
could be acquired at any of the stations, and we usually had to pay
double or triple the price. . . . When we arrived in Kharkov one late
evening, we were able to continue without delay, which pleased Claassen
very much since he feared that he would be pursued [1] . . . . Claassen
sent a telegraph in Oriol, and when we arrived in Tula, we remained two
days. Pastor Landesen’s wife was overjoyed to see us and quartered us
with her children, to whom we seemed to be most welcome and with
whom the Lord granted us many a lovely conversation .... On our
further journey to Moscow we had the misfortune to tip once more, but
happily nothing serious happened .... Once more we are bidden:
‘Tomorrow we depart, good-bye, good-bye’— to wit on the railway to St.
Petersburg .... Otto Forchhammer.”
d) Johann Claassen, letter of April 19,1866: “. . . On Sunday,
November 20, 1860, we arrived in St. Petersburg and took lodging with a
Baptist brother named Plonus. The time spent in St. Petersburg was a
real test of my patience; the dear Lord taught me, and you too there in
Molotschna, to exercise patience and rely on His help . . . .”
4. Johann Claassen ’s most humble petition to His Majesty the
Tsar. (Supplement to #98.) The copy in our possession is in German
translation with a note in Claassen’s hand: “On Monday, May 21, 1862,
I delivered the petition, in the Russian language, to an aide-de-camp of
the emperor in Zarskoie Selo.” Our document reads as follows:
“Most 9erene Emperor!
Most gracious Lord!
a) With hope and devotion the undersigned humbly undertakes to
petition you, our Emperor, for protection in a matter whose undoubted
righteousness on the one hand, as well as the shameful misuse of
authority, intentional perversion of truth, persecution, mistreatment,
etc., on the other hand, can be clearly seen from the accompanying
Promemoria.
b) "Briefly, the matter is as follows: a number (ca. 50) 137 of
Molotschna Mennonites of the Province of Taurida, District of Berdian
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…