← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 332 (not an original page number)
Unit 332 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
sk,
on Jan. 6, 1860, after they had recognized the moral decay that had
entered the church as well as the private lives of their fellow believers,
decided to form an independent church in accordance with their
convictions in the sense of true and strict disciples of the teaching of the
Gospel and their original teacher, Menno Simons.
c) “As guidelines they used the same right attested to both by the
Gospel and Menno’s teaching, as was used earlier and repeatedly in the
similar instances in the Molotschna Mennonite congregations, such as
§159
346
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
the Lichtenauer, and so-called ‘Kleine’ Gemeinde, which are recognized
to this day and serve as examples. In spite of this, the church elders, to
whom the formation of a new church appeared to be an act threatening
their authority, persuaded the local authorities to initiate such
oppressive and persecutive measures that the newly established church
was not only doomed to complete economic ruin, but also daily lost more
and more civil rights and privileges. These actions involuntarily call to
mind the days of the fanatical inquisition in the Middle Ages.
d) “The Supervisory Commission for the welfare of foreign settlers in
South Russia, although it received complaints regarding the
above-mentioned grievances, has, until the present, neglected to limit the
arbitrariness of the Area Administrative Office, rather it has
strengthened it in its arbitrary actions through its decrees as well as and
especially in that the numerous orders of the Ministry of Crown
Lands— consequent to the complaints of the undersigned for an
explanation of the matter at hand— have remained unanswered by the
Supervisory Commission for nearly a full year.
e) “Although the last-mentioned circumstance of itself may already
serve as proof of the unjust handling of this matter on the part of the
entire colonial administration, it nevertheless still follows that the refusal
of the Supervisory Commission to submit the required explanations de-
prives the Ministry of Crown Lands of the possibility of taking appropriate
measures for the protection of the new Mennonite church, so that
complete ruin continues to threaten people whose hearts are faithfully
devoted to their faith, emperor and fatherland. (People who only and
solely plead to be allowed to strive, in word and deed, in church,
family and fellowship, amid their other fellow believers, to call to life
anew the virtues of their forefathers that are disappearing among their
descendants, or, in extreme emergency, to practice this their life purpose
by resettling on crown or other purchased territories.) [This bracketed
passage is crossed out with a pencil in our copy.]
f) “Most gracious Emperor! Incline your ear to the humble complaint
of your faithful children, who, next to God, seek their aid from you: their
petition is that they be granted a just protection in the practice of their
evangelical wor
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…