← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 335 (not an original page number)
Unit 335 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
the rounds in February of 1860:
“In accordance with the order of the Area Administrative Office, the
owners of farms, 140 landless owners of homes 141 and renters’ « are hereby
informed that a few members of the Molotschna Mennonite
congregations have had the impudence to celebrate holy communion
amongst themselves in the colony of Elizabethtal. And in spite of the
Documentary Supplements
349
admonitions directed toward them, they did not want to relinquish their
erroneous opinions; rather, they have much more severed themselves in
writing from their respective congregations in order to establish a
separate church, and have held many meetings amongst themselves.
Thus the Area Administrative Office finds itself compelled, on the basis
of article 362 of the penal code, promulgated in 1857, to take action. The
article reads:
"The founders and heads of secret [!] societies, which, although they
may not have subversive objectives, are nevertheless forbidden by
specific governmental orders and decrees, are subject to imprisonment
for a period of six months to one year. The members of such a society, if
they knew of the decrees forbidding them, are subject to imprisonment
for a period of seven days to three weeks.” [Something seems to be
missing here in our copy.]
“The village mayoral offices are hereby most strictly ordered to
supervise this matter most closely in order to make sure that no
meetings of a religious nature take place in private houses amongst the
above-named or other members. The mayoral offices are obliged to bring
this to everyone’s attention and have the responsibility to turn over
without delay any transgressors of this order, as well as the owners in
whose houses such meetings may take place, to the Area Administrative
Office for further disposal in this matter” [January 27, I860].
o) “II. The Inquiry of the Colonial Inspector of March 1, 1860, sub
No. 293.
“At the same time, as a consequence of the questions to be
answered by the Area Administrative Office with regard to the
brotherhood in question and prescribed by the honorable colonial
inspector, the Area Administrative Office, in the spirit of the above
circular, informs those authorities next in line. (Word for word):
“1. What are the essential characteristics of the movement?
2. What kind of detrimental consequences could result for the Mennonite
brotherhood from it, and 3. What kind of steps will have to be taken in
order to bring about the dissolution of this society and whether or not it
is necessary to deal with the founders as disturbers of the general peace
and order, i.e., that after they have been captured, they be excluded from
the status of colonist as a corrective measure, if the congregations give
their consent to this.”
p) “In response to the Area Administrative Office’s request, the
following made their declaration:
“III. The church elders (with the exception of Johann Harder) on
March 11:
350
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…