← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 334 (not an original page number)
Unit 334 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
eir intentions, the church elders decided, on January
18, 1860, to ban these people from the church and transfer further
responsibility to the Area Administrative Office. Of and by itself this
church ban, as a right granted by the Gospel and Menno Simon’s
teachings to every church for its self-governance, could give the newly
348
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
organized fellowship no reason for complaint, especially since the
brethren of this fellowship had already publicly seceded from their
former churches, had not the local authorities, as a result of this ban,
declared the brethren ineligible for various civil rights guaranteed by the
law of the realm. Thus, under threat of the church ban, all intercourse
with the banned was forbidden, not only in regard to religious fellowship,
but even in regard to purely secular matters such as : buying, selling, the
making of contracts, services, co mmuni ty living, etc. The natural
consequences thereof were: a) the complete standstill in farming,
industry and business of those banned, whose debtors even believed
themselves justified in stopping payments, and b) the denial of the right
to pursue their businesses outside the colonies through a custom existing
in the Mennonite colonies, though not accepted by imperial law, that
visas or passports are issued only upon receipt of a so-called
ecclesiastical certification issued by the church elders concerned, which is
naturally not granted to the banned, and when issued by their church, is
not recognized.
m) “The ruin arising for the newly-formed church from such an
application of the church ban is evident, and in this regard it is sufficient
evidence to mention the Mennonite Isaak Matthies, whose sizeable
business, according to receipts (ca. 15,000 silver rubles annual turnover)
was not only totally boycotted, but, at the discretion of the local
administration, a part of his assets were also sold at public auction to
satisfy several of his creditors, while various Mennonites, who owed
Matthies some 30,000 silver rubles, stopped payment 139 (because
Matthies was banned), and the municipal court left without
consideration Matthies' request to demand payment of at least part of
this debt to avert the sale of his property. In precisely the same manner
regarding the property of each one, all the remaining brethren in the new
church are condemned to complete bankruptcy. But soon another type of
persecution was added to all this heartache on the part of the police, i.e.
the local Area Administrative Office,— persecutions, which involuntarily
call to mind the fanatical religious hatred and Inquisition of the Middle
Ages. Endless summons and hearings in the Area Administrative Office,
threats, imprisonments, hunger and hard labor sentences, etc., were and
are the order of the day. The following facts offer proof thereof:
n) “I. The Circular of the Molotschna Mennonite Area Administra-
tive Office, which begem to make
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…