← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 338 (not an original page number)
Unit 338 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
y his expired visa, with the petition to forward him a new passport
to St. Petersburg through his relatives, and the deputization and letter to
the proper persons. In these letters Claassen asked the brethren, after
they had viewed the prospective purchase in the Crimea, to send him
their final decision and conditions regarding the purchase of the same, as
well as sending in an authorization for closing the contract and
representing their case to the authorities. As earlier, so now the Area
Administrative Office denied not only the issuance of visas for Claassen
and the brethren who had been delegated to view the tract in the Crimea,
but also refused even the certification of the deputization, and in order to
delay the matter as long as possible, transferred responsibility for the
decision in the matter to the Supervisory Commission.
y) “Because section 166, of the Colonial Law, Vol. VII, allows
colonists to purchase inherited and owned land for the improvement and
expansion of their operations, and because according to section 424 and
425 of the same Colonial Law Claassen and his associates in no way
belong to the category of those whom the issuance of visas may be
denied, and since the Area Administrative Office wilfully denies these
persons their colonial rights, and, contrary to section 120, attempts to
coerce their consciences, Claassen complained about these circumstances
in a petition of June 9, 1861, to the Lord Minister of Crown Lands,
asking His Excellency to command the Area Administrative Office to
issue him, Claassen, and those brethren planning to travel to the Crimea,
the desired visas, as well as properly certifying the deputization for
closing the contract. The ministry promptly issued the corresponding
order to the Supervisory Commission, at the same time demanding an
explanation regarding Claassen’s complaint.
z) “In hopes of an answer from the Supervisory Commission along
with a visa and deputization, as well as the hoped-for decision of the
minister following therefrom, Claassen, in compliance with the expressed
wish of the brethren, remained in St. Petersburg, where on orders of the
ministry, he was supplied with the necessary residence permits through
the office of Crown Lands. Although the ministry repeatedly pressed for
the fulfillment of this command by the Supervisory Commission, the
matter has not yet made any progress and the commission has now
failed to reply to all orders for nearly a year. In the Molotschna colonies,
meanwhile, both the ecclesiastical dissension and the persecutions of the
young church have continued, as heretofore; the attempted land
purchase has been postponed, and Claassen and the brethren suffer ever
greater ruin.
Documentary Supplements
353
a) “VI. The order of the Area Administrative Office to Claassen in
St. Petersburg, dated July 4, 1861.
“On July 18, 1861, Claassen received the following order from the
Molotschna Mennonite Area Adminis
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…