← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 339 (not an original page number)
Unit 339 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
trative Office:
“The Area Administrative Office has transferred your petition for
issuance of a visa and deputization by your like-minded cohorts to the
Supervisory Commission for Foreign Settlers. The president of the
commission verbally ruled that since you have seceded from the church
and therefore cannot produce the ministerial certification necessary for
the issuance of a visa, you may in no way be issued an annual visa, but
only a one-month visa necessary for your return. If you do not return
within that time, however, the commission shall be notified and the
necessary measures will be taken for your police extradition.
“Regarding the certification of your deputization, His Excellency
ordered that the law be followed, which states that such deputization
must be obtained in the circuit courts, where the issuing parties must
personally sign them. The Area Administrative Office herewith sends
your one-month visa and advises you, upon receipt of the same, unless
you want to be treated as a vagabond, to return immediately because the
Area Administrative Office will promptly execute His Excellency’s
orders regarding your return.
Colony Administrator Friesen
Secretary Martens.
b) “VII. Claassen’s further moves.
“Naturally Claassen could not comply with such a demand without at
the same time giving up all hope of a swift consummation of his
assignment, all the more because it was evident that only decisive
intervention on the part of the higher authorities could bring about an
unprejudiced and just settlement of the religious dissension in question.
But Claassen still did not neglect to make numerous urgent petitions to
the Area Administrative Office in order to achieve a peaceful settlement
of the dispute. Meanwhile, on July 24, 1861, he presented a written
complaint to the honorable president of the Supervisory Commission in
which he requested just protection, at least insofar as was necessary for
the land purchase in progress, on the basis of the religious liberties
promised to the Mennonites. At the same time, Claassen explained,
among other things, how he was forced to distrust the contents of the
order of July 18, 1861, received from the Area Administrative Office,
because this order, though allegedly issued by the president, was in
contradiction to the existing laws, which make no mention of the
ministerial certification practiced by the Mennonites, and positively
354
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
guarantees the issuance of a passport to persons in similar positions to
him, Claassen, at any time. Claassen further explained that he could
produce the required ministerial certification, though none other than
that issued by his own church, whose authority was not recognized by
the Area Administrative Office. And finally, Claassen declared that he
was thoroughly f amili ar with deputizations by the district courts, and
that he also knew that without the certification of the identity of t
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…