← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 35 (not an original page number)
Unit 35 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
he shall
bring him to the place of judgment and there cut out his tongue;
thereupon he shall be thrown onto a cart and his flesh tom twice with a
pair of red hot tongs; then he shall bring him to the gates of the city and
there torture him again in like manner.’ This horrible judgment was
carried out and the mutilated body later burned to ashes. Settler’s wife
and various other women who had been captured with him were
drowned. A number of the brethren, who were together with him in
prison, were beheaded. Rottenburg became famous for such incidents.
b) “Hans Breal was captured in the Tyrol in 1557. After he had
been repeatedly tortured in the futile hope that he could be forced to
betray his brethren, he was finally thrown into a deep, dark and damp
tower where he could see neither sun nor moon, nor even the slightest
daylight, so that he never knew whether it was day or night. On occasion
he could tell that it was night because it was cooler than before. The jail
was dirty, damp and gloomy so that his clothes rotted on his very body
and he was forced, for a time, to sit there naked. He had nothing but a
coarse blanket which had been given to him; this he threw around his
body and sat there in misery in the darkness. His shirt had moulded to
such an extent that, with the exception of the collar which he hung on
the wall, it could not even be used for a rag. As the sons of Pilate led him
out in order to see if he wished to recant, the light of day caused him
such agony that he was happy when they once again allowed him to go
down to his dark tower. . . . Thus he lay in this gloomy tower for a long
time, surrounded by mould and vermin; he protected his head with an
old hat which had been thrown down to him out of pity. For many years
no one had been imprisoned in this tower so that the vermin had
multiplied in great numbers; only with time was he able to conquer his
disgust and abhorrence of it. The worms often gnawed at his feet. ... All
summer long he lay in this gloomy tower, until shortly before Michaelmas
in the late autumn. When it became apparent that the cold had begun to
19
20
ORIGINS
penetrate the tower, he was brought out and put into another prison
which could impossibly be worse. There he had to remain, with one hand
and one foot placed in the stock for 37 weeks, so that it was impossible
for him either to sit or lie down, forcing him to stand all the while. He
also had to suffer a great deal of mockery and scorn at the hands of the
godless. . . . Finally, the Council at Innsbruck issued a decree which the
officials brought him to read. The content read as follows: ‘Since he is so
stubborn and will accept no admonition, he shall be sent to serve on the
galley ships 32 the morning after this is presented to him; there he will
discover how the obstinate are whipped and beaten.’ But Hans replied
that he intended to trust the Lord his God who could be found on sea as
well as on land;
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…