← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 357 (not an original page number)
Unit 357 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
on I went to van Ark [organist of the Dutch church, in
whose family he found the most congenial company]; towards evening
Forchhammer also came to us. He had spent a night with Neander. We
had a relaxing conversation .... Johann Claassen.”
g) Brother Forchhammer was seriously ill for three weeks ; Claassen
had nursed him; we experienced much brotherly love: visits, soups,
wines, a good doctor, and other things, grapes, apples, linens. “St.
Petersburg, January 31 ... . There was always something ready for
dinner .... The old lady Nordbeck, a dear sister, would say: ‘He who
tends the sick must also receive something.’ Soon provision was made
that I could go out for two or three hours a day for fresh air ... . [When
the brothers and sisters— that is already the name for ‘these
church-minded Christian friends!’— noticed that Claassen was growing
pale because he was constantly staying in the sick room, they relieved
him periodically at nursing.] . . . Madame Nordbeck is a 74-year-old
lady, very rich, but not ashamed to visit the sick in their nook. The
physician [Dr. Mikvitz, son-in-law of Madame Nordbeck] visits
Forchhammer almost daily. He is so friendly that one easily confides in
him .... I was fortunate to see the Tsar at close range .... Johann
Claassen.”
h) Claassen to the brothers and sisters. “St. Petersburg, December
6, 1861 ... Today several Baptist brethren from the Courland were
with me. They, too, had a petition to the Emperor. They were
Latvians, whom I had promised to help as much as I knew how. . . .
Johann Claassen.”
11. An interesting depiction of customs and manners at the Menno-
nite Area Administrative Office in the Molotschna at this time is given to us
by Br. Jakob Reimer, Gnadenfeld, in a letter to Claassen. “On October 4
(1861), ... I, Benjamin, and your wife [Reimer’s sister] . . . and Brother
Peters, Ladekopp . . . drove to the Area Administrative Office to obtain
the decision on your petition to the Empress [cf. above; the question
regarding the land purchase remained unresolved as yet; as we know, a
half year later the Minister of War again took up the matter of the
settlement in the Caucasus. On the assumption that Claassen had gone
home, the petition and the resolution of the Ministry of Crown Lands
had been sent to the Area Administrative Office], for the Area
Administrative Office had written to your [Liebenauer] village office,
that if you were home, you were to pick up the decision immediately.
However, if you were not at home, this response was to be reported at
§166
372
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
once. The Area Administrator [David Friesen] would not give us the
decision, but he allowed me to copy it. At the table where I sat and
wrote, there was seated, after all, only the small [secretary] Voth with
one arm, and Brother Peters stood at my side, and the other people
seemed quite kind, outwardly . . . ; still I felt as though my hands and
my fingers wer
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…