Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 356 (not an original page number)

Unit 356 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
tement about Claassen’s and Forchhammer’s report about how the Gospel has affected their hearts]. Your brother, Jakob Becker.” d) Claassen to his wife. “St. Petersburg, October 19, 1861. I did not want to ask the governmental authorities [this is the reproach of the brethren against him] whether we might believe and baptize, but only whether it is possible that we might be protected against deliberate attack, as Paul was protected against death by the Jews .... Paul did not want to ask the emperor whether he could believe, any more than I want to ask the authorities this. Furthermore, my dear little wife, you must distinguish between what the law says and what has been promised. [The question is whether he was willing to promise not to do this and that in return for the retention of received privileges, as some brethren feared. This, however, he denies.] ... In the end, God’s law stands highest .... It is God's grace that during the time I have been away it has pleased Him to give you His Spirit in even greater measure. 149 And we do not know what may yet happen in the future. May our gracious and good Savior be merciful to you and strengthen and comfort you to do His will! Amen.” e) “Sunday, October 22, we had a first meeting at the home of Br. Plonus. [Of him Forchhammer writes to Mrs. Gertrude Reimer on October 6: ‘Plonus, the Baptist brother, has drawn much closer to us and now wants to have co mmuni on with us’— although neither Claassen nor Forchhammer had been ‘baptized’] . . . We had urged German tradesmen to meet with us and now we preached the Gospel to them. . . . They promised to come again and to bring others with them. To begin with, the Lord sent us four of them [at first, social conversation, then singing, reading of the Scriptures] . . . and we discussed these quite informally .... We told them, too, that we were not pastors but that we had experienced the grace of God in our hearts, and this we hoped for them, too. 150 . . . Johann Claassen.” f) Claassen to his brothers and sisters. “St. Petersburg, January 3, 1862. . . . Sunday, the thirty-first, I visited the Duchess Dettloff [an elderly lady who introduced him to Mr. Mueller, a Prussian gentleman travelling to the Caucasus. He was on a land-purchasing mission for the Prussian Prince Albert and came to seek advice from Claassen]. I was with her from one to three o’clock, had breakfast, and talked of many things. [Thus, in Claassen’s circle of friends the ‘old wives of generals’ of St. Petersburg, the well-known, influential ‘Staruschki,’ could not be absent either. The latter were kind and always ready to help, and formerly, so it was said, nothing could be done in St. Petersburg without Documentary Supplements 371 them . . . .] From there I went to Brim 151 where I met another gentleman and we had fellowship around the Word of God .... New Year [1862], Before noon I read Job and that strengthened me ... . After twelve no

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…