← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 385 (not an original page number)
Unit 385 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
63. The “regulatory and corrective behavior”
regarding the conduct of services by the “brethren,” here truthfully
attested, was, as we know, overturned once more in a sad manner for half
a year during the winter of 1864-65, as documented in “C” below.
17. A Further Set of Assembly Minutes!
a) "To the Honorable Molotschna Mennonite Area Administrative
Office at Halbstadt. Report from the office of the village mayor of
Liebenau. The Liebenau mayor’s office begs to report that the local
resident Johann Claassen attended the worship services in the school here
in Liebenau on January 1 and January 13; 177 immediately after the
service he got up and urged the church members to remain behind, since
it was necessary to talk some more about salvation; he did so knowing,
as he had been told earlier, that he was to discontinue such scenes, since
the church could not sanction them. After being reported for disturbing
the peace in the church service, as stated above, he was taken to account
by the mayor's office and told to discontinue 178 the said episodes,
whereupon he stated that he would not let any one forbid him to do so,
adding the comment that he would continue. So we have no alternative
but to ask the honorable Area Administrative Office to consider our
request to prohibit Claassen from carrying out said disruptions, in order
that we no longer be disturbed in our worship services by Claassen or
other persons belonging to his sect. No. 8, Liebenau, January 21, 1863.
Mayor Schroeder. Council-member Schmidt. Council-member Neufeld.”
b) “Memorandum. January 30, 1863. Present: Area Director David
Friesen, Area Council member Johann Wiens, Area Council member
Klaas Wiebe. After hearing the report of the Liebenau mayoral office No.
8, of January 21, concerning the disturbance of the worship service in the
school there by the Mennonite Johann Claassen, the latter was asked to
appear on today’s date, and after being orally interrogated, was asked to
respond to the following questions in his own handwriting: 1) Whether
he, Claassen, had really, as reported by the village office, stood up in the
Liebenau school on January 1 and January 13, after completion of the
worship service, and had asked the church members to remain behind,
Documentary Supplements
399
since it was necessary to speak more about salvation, even though he
knew, and had been told, to discontinue such incidents? 2) Whether,
after being reported for this and asked to appear at the mayoral office, he
had said (that he) would not discontinue 179 that kind of act? 3) How
far he feels called to give lectures when only the spiritual teachers of the
Mennonites do this in the pursuit of their official duties according to
their doctrines and in accordance with his own quotation of #3, of the
Instructions for the Establishment and Administration of the Colonies
(now Articles 1104 and 1105, Part 1, Volume XI, 1896 edition of the
Code of Laws), and it
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…