← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 389 (not an original page number)
Unit 389 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
concerned with
the foreign settlers in South Russia: A most humble submission. On
October 4 of this year, Johann Claassen, a member of our congregation,
was requested to appear before the Mennonite Area Administrative Office
of Molotschna, and in their presence and that of the Agricultural
Society was asked to give a report on the success of the trip of our delegates
to the Kuban District. Claassen mistrusted the Area Administra-
tive Office because up to that point it had always been working
against the interests of our church. And because even now,
during the discussion, the colony administrative officer became very
vehement, threatening Claassen with imprisonment if he refused to
present in writing what had been requested; and, in general threatening
to see to it that we would lose our status as bona-fide colonists, Claassen
feared to entrust the report of the Kuban journey to the Area
Administrative Office without having first consulted his own church.
Once the church had considered the matter, it felt constrained to present
the above as well as the Promemoria to the Supervisory Commission in
humble obedience. Enclosed herewith is also the testimony received from
Major-General Sabuzky, which we wish to present to you. Furthermore,
we must add that the church has no confidence in the Area
Administrative Office because, as it has done in other cases, it could
place obstacles in the way of an eventual exodus from the Molotschna
District. Abraham Peters, 181 David Claassen [the oldest brother of the
delegate], Johann Claassen [David C.’s son], Peter Stobbe, Peter
Martens, Heinrich Nickel, Benjamin Becker, Peter Nickel, Johann
Claassen [the delegate], Cornelius Reimer, Johann Claassen [nephew of
the delegate], Cornelius Knelsen, Simon Harms, Johann Huebert, Peter
Dyck, Johann Martins, Cornelius Penner, Jakob Reimer, Dietrich
Claassen [older brother of the delegate], Bernhard Penner, Johann
Strauss, Friederich Strauss, David Duerksen, Abram Dyck, Franz
Claassen, Isaak Koop, Abraham Wiens, Cornelius Wiens, Heinrich
Flaming, Abraham Regier, Heinrich Neufeld, Dietrich Claassen [Dietrich
Documentary Supplements
403
C.’s son], Bernhard Janzen, Martin Klaassen, Jakob Kroeker, Abraham
Wiens, Wilhelm Loewen. The ministers of the church: Heinrich Huebert,
Jakob Becker. Dated October 10, 1862, Colony Liebenau.”
b) “Promemoria [re the above submission]. On July 4 our church
member Johann Claassen was ordered to appear before the Area
Administrative Office and requested to report on what he had been able
to accomplish in St. Petersburg, which he did in a few words. He also
showed the letters from the honorable Minister of War to Graf
Evdokimov and requested a travel permit to the Kuban in order to visit
that district. However, because the colony administrative officer was
sick and not in his office, Claassen was asked to come at another time
and deal with the administrator himself about the travel permit. On
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…