← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 390 (not an original page number)
Unit 390 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
July
24 Claassen returned to the office and requested a travel permit to the
Kuban. This time, however, he was asked to appear at the Area
Administrative Office on August 1 along with five other brethren. On
August 1 these men were asked by the Area Administrative Office
whether they wanted to return to their original congregations or not [!!!].
They declared that for the sake of their conscience they could not do so.
After that Claassen requested (for the third time) a travel permit to the
Kuban. To this he received a firm negative reply. On August 4 Claassen
made the fourth journey to the same office, this time equipped with a
supporting document (under #107) from the village office of Liebenau,
which stated that as far as the village of Liebenau was concerned
nothing stood in the way of granting Claassen a two-month travel
permit. He also had a statement from the minister of our church
[Heinrich Huebert] addressed to the Area Administrative Office
requesting a two-month pass. But in spite of both documents, a travel
permit was summarily denied. He was now advised that if the elders of
the church would give their permission to the request for a travel permit,
then he would be given one. At the close of the meeting the
administrative officer mentioned that Claassen could also attend the
Conference of the Elders which was to take place on the following
Thursday, August 9, in Alexanderwohl. When Claassen presented a
written request to the elders at the Conference on August 9, that they
not place any difficulties in the way of his receiving a travel permit, they
returned the request with the explanation that the granting of passes
and travel permits did not come under their jurisdiction but rather that
of the Area Administrative Office. The elders from the Ohrloff
congregation and the Kleine Gemeinde, Harder and Friesen, however,
declared that they could see no reason why the elders as such should
have anything against the granting of such passes or permits. On
hearing this, the other elders remained silent. The administrative officer,
however, now feeling compelled to issue monthly travel passes for the
404
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
trip of the delegates to the Kuban, nevertheless declared in a very abrupt
fashion that permits would be available for 28 days only. On August 11
Claassen made his fifth journey to the Area Administrative Office in
order to pick up the promised permits from the officer. He was now told,
however, that it would be better for him to pick up the permits just
before the time of departure. Every time Claassen had to make a round
trip of 44 versts [22 versts from Liebenau to Halbstadt]. Thereupon
Claassen left for home once more, still without the travel permits. On
August 15 Claassen finally received a permit for a month. At the same
time and for the same purpose two other brethren were to receive
permits: Abraham Wiens from Elizabethal and Simon Harms from
Liebenau. T
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…