← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 393 (not an original page number)
Unit 393 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
of the Molotschna and Ekaterinoslav
Mennonites who have expressed a desire to settle on the banks of the
Kuban River: Attention: Johann Claassen. Please be advised that His
Imperial Majesty has ordered the commanders of the army to set aside a
tract of land on the Kuban River for the Mennonites from the
Molotschna and Ekaterinoslav, who, numbering 100 families, have
expressed a desire to settle in the Caucasus. The tract of land is on the
left bank of the river Kuban, downstream from the mouth of the
Selentschuk River, in the amount of 65 dessiatines per family. The army
commanders of the Kuban Province hereby order you, as deputy of the
Mennonites, to let all prospective settlers in the group know that 6500
dessiatines of land has been set aside for them and that those who desire
to settle in their new district may do so at once. Chief of Staff,
Major-General, Sabuzky.”
f) Claassen’s letter, April 19, 1866: “. . . On October 10 I received a
letter from the General Staff to the effect that we have permission to
graze our cattle on our land, etc. . . .”
§175(2) g) Petition of the Brethren in the Molotschna to the Ministry of
Crown Lands, December 30, 1863. a) It solicits the repeal of civil and
ecclesiastical restrictions, especially the impediments placed in the way
of marriages and migration to the Kuban. The appended Promemoria
contains an explanation of all the important moves and oppressions of
the M.B. Church since its organization with written documentation
(including the Promemoria for submission to the Supervisory
Commission on October 18, 1862) up to and including the Certificate of
October 2, 1863, No. 2746 and the circular of December 7, 1863, No.
12652 (cf. #110 above). The petition is signed by the same 58 brethren
whose names appear at the end of the following Promemoria. Original
signatures on our copies, b) “Promemoria." (After quoting the
Documentary Supplements
407
correspondence from Elder Harder dated November 12, 1862, cf. #108a
above, it reads:) . . But the other elders demanded that their
respective congregations consent to our exclusion from the colonial
status, which they, however, did not do. 182 [Concerning Gnadenfeld, cf.
#108c, the Kleine Gemeinde maintained a friendly neutrality, and Ohrloff
was protective.] This act established our essential recognition as a
separate Mennonite church; but we were deceived. For although the
Area Administrative Office received the October 2, 1863, certificate #2746
from the Caucasus board on November 30, 1863, when Claassen reported
on the results of his last journey to Stavropol and Tiflis, they made the
following negative declarations against Claassen. They said they wished
to expedite our resettlement and wanted to be helpful, so Claassen
should hasten to submit a list of families wishing to resettle at the
Kuban. Thus they gave the appearance of wishing us well and indicating
that we had no reason to be distrustful. But 103 s
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…