Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 392 (not an original page number)

Unit 392 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
Connection with the Kuban Settlement. a) Johann Claassen, in a letter dated April 19, 1866: . . In May, 1863, 1 travelled with Abraham Unger to Stavropol, but was not able to accomplish anything because no written information had been received as yet. In June I travelled with Peter Berg to Stavropol and Tiflis .... On Tuesday [June 25] we arrived at Tiflis. . . .” b) Benjamin Becker in a letter to Claassen and Peter Berg, received in Stavropol: “Liebenau, June 18, 1863. [At the request of Jakob and Cornelius Reimer he suggests that if the land purchase in the Kuban does not work out satisfactorily, he should arrange to rent land.] Dear brother, do remain in good spirits and do not become discouraged on that account as you work for the Lord and the brethren, for your reward in heaven will be great. We can never repay you for the good you are doing on our behalf .... Here, dear brother, we want to show compassion to your wife and children and make every effort, as best we can, to see that they will be well looked after while all this trouble is still with us. . . . Benjamin Becker.” c) Johann Claassen, April 19, 1866: “. . . On July 12, 1863, our written petition was presented to the Grand-Duke, his Imperial Highness Michael Nikolaievitsch, and granted by him. General H. von Karzov congratulated us . . . that our request had been granted, and that each family was to receive 65 dessiatines of land. . . . On July 18 we left Tiflis and arrived in Stavropol on Saturday, July 27 ... . Berg left on July 29 ... it was my lot to wait again .... On August 15 I presented our plan [of settlement] to the count .... On the 19th I received the Certificate No. 2266 .... On August 20 I left Stavropol and arrived back home in the Molotschna on the 28th . . . .” d) "Certificate. [Translation from the Russian.] That the Ekaterino- slav and Molotschna Mennonites, who expressed the desire to settle on the left bank of the Kuban opposite the Staniza Nevinomysk, have really §175 406 THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH been alloted appropriate parcels of land by His Imperial Majesty the governor of Caucasus, I attest with my signature and imprint of the imperial seal. No. 2266, Stavropol, August 19, 1863. Chief of Staff of the Kuban army, Major General Sabuzky.” (Seal.) e) Letter of Johann Claassen, April 19, 1866: ", . . On September 23 [1863] I again travelled ... to Stavropol and arrived there on October 8. I had been sent, firstly, to arrange for some sort of accommodation for the cattle [which other brethren were driving there]; and, secondly, . . . to gain confirmation of the precise borders of our land. I made a request to the Grand-Duke. In Stavropol I received a copy of the Certificate No. 2746 that had been mailed to the Molotschna Colony . . . .” (Translation of the Russian original): “Army Headquarters, Province of Kuban, General Staff, 2nd Division, October 2, 1863. No. 2746. Stavropol. To the delegates

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…