← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 398 (not an original page number)
Unit 398 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
e hindrances which will prevent said families from
leaving their assembly? c) to permit them to elect representatives from
their midst to inspect the land granted for their resettlement to the
Kuban, and to fulfill the preparatory work for resettlement, and supply
them with visas for the trip there. After the accomplished agreement of
the settlers with the Caucasus board, the arrangements for the actual
resettlement will be left to their judgment, while the Supervisory
Commission will correspond with the Caucasus province about the final
count of the Mennonites from the Taurida and Ekaterinoslav states who
actually resettled there. In addition to the above, the first department
states that the determination of the rights which the resettlers are to
enjoy at their new place of residence, will be dependent on the Caucasus
board in whose administrative area they settle. For the director, N.N.
[illegible]. Division Chairman, Heinrichsson.”
c) The actual dismissal from the colonial association of villages
seems to have been accomplished without difficulty. Copies of
statements by the villages dismissing the members are extant, as for
example from the village of Sparrau, in whose “revised list” [“Dessiataia
Revisia”] the Claassen family appears.
d) Finally the authority to move! a) The letter of Johann Claasen,
April 19, 1866: "... On Saturday May 9, 1864, the brethren were
assembled together in Halbstadt in order to confer the authority upon
me and choose a man to care for orphans [in accordance with Mennonite
custom to defend the interests of widows and orphans and be in charge
of guardianships and inheritances]. Br. Peters [Abraham Peters of
Ladekopp] and I were elected deputies, if I had anything to write from
Tiflis. ... On May 14 I was in court in Berdiansk with a few of the
brethren, in order to have my authority confirmed. The court demanded
that those persons be present who had signed my authority in
Halbstadt . . . . The brethren came and my authority was confirmed . . . .”
b) The Molotschna document of authorization is not in our possession,
but we do possess one identical to the original of the brethren from the
Chortitza District, in Russian and German, on a stamped sheet of paper.
The German reads: “The honorable Johann Claassen. After the Ministry
412
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
§177
of Crown Lands had, as a consequence of your mediation, 189 ordered
that we, together with our colleagues and up to 100 families, be allowed
to resettle in the Kuban, it informed the Mennonite Heinrich Huebert
that the determination of the rights we were to enjoy in the new
settlement, were dependent upon the Caucasus authorities. Since we
wish to enjoy the same rights which all Mennonites possess in Southern
Russia, we beg you to travel to the Kuban region, there to persuade the
local authorities to grant us the above-mentioned privileges in the new
settlement in that region, and to acquire from them
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…