Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 398 (not an original page number)

Unit 398 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
e hindrances which will prevent said families from leaving their assembly? c) to permit them to elect representatives from their midst to inspect the land granted for their resettlement to the Kuban, and to fulfill the preparatory work for resettlement, and supply them with visas for the trip there. After the accomplished agreement of the settlers with the Caucasus board, the arrangements for the actual resettlement will be left to their judgment, while the Supervisory Commission will correspond with the Caucasus province about the final count of the Mennonites from the Taurida and Ekaterinoslav states who actually resettled there. In addition to the above, the first department states that the determination of the rights which the resettlers are to enjoy at their new place of residence, will be dependent on the Caucasus board in whose administrative area they settle. For the director, N.N. [illegible]. Division Chairman, Heinrichsson.” c) The actual dismissal from the colonial association of villages seems to have been accomplished without difficulty. Copies of statements by the villages dismissing the members are extant, as for example from the village of Sparrau, in whose “revised list” [“Dessiataia Revisia”] the Claassen family appears. d) Finally the authority to move! a) The letter of Johann Claasen, April 19, 1866: "... On Saturday May 9, 1864, the brethren were assembled together in Halbstadt in order to confer the authority upon me and choose a man to care for orphans [in accordance with Mennonite custom to defend the interests of widows and orphans and be in charge of guardianships and inheritances]. Br. Peters [Abraham Peters of Ladekopp] and I were elected deputies, if I had anything to write from Tiflis. ... On May 14 I was in court in Berdiansk with a few of the brethren, in order to have my authority confirmed. The court demanded that those persons be present who had signed my authority in Halbstadt . . . . The brethren came and my authority was confirmed . . . .” b) The Molotschna document of authorization is not in our possession, but we do possess one identical to the original of the brethren from the Chortitza District, in Russian and German, on a stamped sheet of paper. The German reads: “The honorable Johann Claassen. After the Ministry 412 THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH §177 of Crown Lands had, as a consequence of your mediation, 189 ordered that we, together with our colleagues and up to 100 families, be allowed to resettle in the Kuban, it informed the Mennonite Heinrich Huebert that the determination of the rights we were to enjoy in the new settlement, were dependent upon the Caucasus authorities. Since we wish to enjoy the same rights which all Mennonites possess in Southern Russia, we beg you to travel to the Kuban region, there to persuade the local authorities to grant us the above-mentioned privileges in the new settlement in that region, and to acquire from them

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…