← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 4 (not an original page number)
Unit 4 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ution had it
not been for this work of P. M. Friesen! One might only wish that he had
placed this Mennonite story within the larger context of Russian history,
which he undoubtedly knew equally well, but that might well have
doubled the size of the manuscript and left the entire project incomplete
by the time of his death. Some of this contextualizing can still be done
today.
The methodology followed by the author compares favorably with
present canons of good historical scholarship. Who among historians
would not applaud his intention to “write the truth, both good and bad,
even as the Bible does with David”, or empathize with him after the first
four years of work in his lament that he found it difficult to be objective
because the graves were still too fresh to be opened? Who among
historians would not recognize the truth of his comment that in 10-25
years, yes in 1-5 years, traditions form according to how people wish
events to have happened, though reliable documents and even minutes of
meetings they themselves attended and later signed, tell the story
differently? How fortunate we are that Friesen, not trusting his own
objectivity, decided to make it a documentary history, letting the record
speak for itself. I find myself moved particularly by the irenic spirit of
Friesen, evident throughout the entire work, but epitomized most
succinctly in his leitmotif— Ich suche meine Brueder—l am seeking my
brethren (people).
It was on a Sunday evening in the summer of 1886, the author tells
us, that a minister friend communicated to him the request of the
Mennonite Brethren in conference that he write the history of their first
twenty-five years as a separate people. He accepted, and admitted to
himself that he was probably the right man for the task. But he could
not contain himself within the prescribed limits and before he was
finished he and “my best secretary, my faithful wife” had compiled over
10,000 pages of material. From its original intention of being a history of
the Mennonite Brethren movement the manuscript grew to be the most
comprehensive and definitive history we have of all the Mennonites in
Russia. The interrelatedness of events and their context led him
inexorably from telling only part of the story to telling it all as best he
could.
Thus it is that we have before us not only a history of the early
years of the Mennonite Brethren Church in Russia but a fascinating
documentary and interpretive account of the entire Mennonite experience
in Russia from the time of their first migration to the time of the
publication of the volume in 1911. It invites all Mennonites to read it as
a part of their own history as a people, and it invites others too to read it
vu
as an account of how God led in the history of this branch of His family,
the Mennonites. and may the reader, in reading it, catch something of
the spirit of humility, love and complete trust in Almighty God which so
thoroughl
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…