← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 404 (not an original page number)
Unit 404 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
also
opposed to the expressions of unrestrained joy .... The other day we
were at Jakob Jantz in Fuerstenau for the noon meal [he is now an elder
in Friedensfeld; at that time he had been a member of the M.B. Church
for a quarter of a year], then for night we went to Liebenau, where, with
Br. Huebert, we discussed freely how we felt about our experiences with
the brethren, and how the outer demonstration of joy might be directed.
We jointly presented our concerns to our Lord Jesus, and asked Him to
pour out His good Holy Spirit and open the eyes of the brethren. Then in
the forenoon I further discussed these matters with Br. Huebert; we
were of one opinion. When I returned home on Monday evening,
Benjamin, like a commanding officer, also Koop, Bernhard Penner (now
badly confused, 194 even if in a different way], 195 Deleske, and the dear
Franz Klassen, who was there as witness, two single sisters, and the old
Sister Penner [Bernhard’s mother] met at our place. After an
unenthusiastic greeting, the inflated ‘apostle’ [II Cor. 11:6, also 12:11]
announced that they had come to excommunicate me. To my dear wife
he had said ‘to judge,’ at which she was more than a little alarmed.
That this was being planned, and that they were holding such ideas, had
already been told me by some trusted brothers and sisters. For two
hours we presented evidence as to who was right, the four of them
against me (the sisters only expressed agreement). The matter of
principal concern was only the dancing and the playing of the dances. I
then asked them not to exco mmuni cate me, and said I would remain
418
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
quiet and prayerfully examine the issue further before the Lord, and
would leave the leading of church meetings to them [Reimer was
Huebert’s first assistant]. That seemed to satisfy them somewhat, but
after a short pause, Benjamin arose, took the floor, and said, ‘No, that
is not possible, his silence also preaches!’ ‘Yes,’ said Koop, ‘he must
prove it by his actions and join us in our activities!!’ I was presented as
one who had a false teaching and was asked to leave the room [it was the
entry hall in Reimer’s house and dwelling!]. Again I asked them not to
excommunicate me, for they did not constitute the church. Benjamin
responded that they were quite capable of this; and so I went into the
small room and read the letters which had been received from the
brothers and sisters in the Crimea [August Strauss, Andreas Voth and
others moved to the Crimea and settled on rented land there, rather than
going to the Kuban, since they were not in sympathy with the methods
used by the church]. One of the brothers cited Isaiah 43, the first two
verses, at the beginning of his letter. Now they [Benjamin and the
others] instructed my wife and daughter Maria on how they should relate
to me. When they had pronounced the ban on me, and before they left,
they called me inside and announced it to me, with
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…