← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 403 (not an original page number)
Unit 403 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
mber of the older and more
influential brethren were removed from the church in the Molotschna
because of the settlement on the Kuban, and Brother Huebert, in view of
his poor health and severe despondency, as well as the death of his first
wife, proved himself weaker than ever and remained without influence,
while Mr. Jakob Reimer’s influence had been weakened by his hesitation in
the Kuban settlement, leadership fell into the hands of two young,
spiritually shallow but strongly self-confident brethren: Br. Benjamin
Becker, who had already been commissioned as an itinerant minister in
1861 (he was often also boldly called "Apostle!”), and Br. Bernhard
Penner, who had been appointed to assist Br. Huebert. With incredible
energy, these now again began to cultivate the "pure joy,” and thus
established an arrogant despotism over those who did not agree with
them.
b) It must also be admitted that Claassen did not act with sufficient
clear-sightedness, clarity and energy in this matter. This seems almost
incomprehensible in view of the clear and balanced vision he
demonstrated in other spiritual and civil matters. We must let the old
records, of both sides, tell the story.
§182 2. Among the opponents, Jakob Reimer is the most insightful and
significant, and in this, as well as earlier periods, he has provided rich
and photographically accurate material. He writes in his diary: "On
January 9, 1864, my brother-in-law Claassen and Diedrich Claassen came
Documentary Supplements
417
to me [in Gnadenfeld]. The former quarrelled with me because I was
opposed to the playing of dance and march music [in the church
services!] which I, poor soul, believe they play for their own
entertainment and then they dance and jump. I am not opposed to being
joyful nor to what Paul says, ‘Rejoice in the Lord.’ However, I am
opposed to that which is not appropriate for a true Christian, or does not
express love. But I am trying to remain quiet, since nothing can be
changed. The Lord will expose and judge these matters .... On the 30th
of November [1864, after his return from the Kuban] ... we were at
Penners [in Gnadenfeld], where the brethren— especially Benjamin and
Isaak Koop, Elizabethtal, assisted as much as possible by Bernhard-
berated me because I did not join them in their exuberance; instead,
when they had music and dance, I would leave .... On December 6, 1864,
I was in Liebenau, where the brothers and sisters were meeting, but
because of the difficult roads, only a few had come. Toward evening they
very nearly expressed their joy with hands and feet, mouth and lips, but
my presence bothered them. After the others had left, we confidentially
discussed the sad condition of the church, and the five of us [Mrs.
Claassen, Mrs. Gertrude Reimer, Brother and Sister Franz and Reimer]
seemed to be of one opinion. From here I went ... to Christian Schmidt
[at that time living in the Russian village of Tokmak]. They are
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…