← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 432 (not an original page number)
Unit 432 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ain hidden away, I had
to see him in the ‘comer room’ and to first accept his repimand [on
behalf of the church— we had already been privately reconciled to each
other]. He accused me of avarice and of f ailin g to exercise love toward
brothers and sisters who differed from my opinions and of many other
things which had been communicated to him in writing ....
Documentary Supplements
445
Nevertheless, I must admit to the honor of my Lord, that things went
much better than I had hoped .... Many prayers were uttered and
much was mutually admitted and forgiven— indeed, in most cases it was
done sincerely. [Only Bernhard Penner, Hermann Peters, and those
influenced by him remained aloof.] In general it was very delightful to
behold how brethren extended hands to each other and became
reconciled, and how they confirmed it with a kiss. The same thing took
place among the sisters. I believe the angels in heaven rejoiced as did the
Lord Jesus himself Who is the fullness of love .... For the night to
Tokmak .... This was a blessed and joyous night for us and the
[Christian] Schmidts, which was spent in discussion, thanksgiving,
praise, and prayer almost until morning . . . .”
14. Reconciliation in the Einlage Church, a) “On July 22,” Reimer §194
continues elsewhere, “we gathered in Einlage where another reconciliation
between the ‘enthusiastic’ and the ‘sober-minded’ brethren took place.
On the 29th of the month the brothers and sisters met again, a meeting
to which all of the believers had been invited in order to bring about a
new, inner and complete accord” [which always threatened to be
disrupted there for some time, as is revealed in the history dealing
particularly with the Einlage M.B. Church].
b) Johann Wieler, in “My Thoughts," August/September 1882,
relates: "... After Br. Claassen had engaged in a blessed ministry in the
Molotschna Church in 1865, he came to Einlage in order to bring about
an accord there as well. Because Gerhard Wieler was still in prison, it
was easier to deal with those who had strayed. Soon after Claassen ’s
departure, the fruit of his labors became evident. Gerhard Wieler, after
he had been released from prison, made a few further attempts in the
Molotschna to work together with the ‘enthusiasts’ [Hermann Peters
and his associates], but soon serious friction developed between them,
and (in 1866/67) he joined the . . . Chortitza Mennonite Church.
c) “In this way,” Johann Wieler concludes, “the Church was
enabled to become more mindful of those things which would promote
improvement within the group as well as benefit the [Mennonite]
brotherhood spiritually . . . .”
15. Doctrinal Statement of the M.B. Church to the Government §195
Representative.
His Excellency, Procurator of the General Consistory, the honorable
Privy Councillor Brun. 224
At the time when two of our brethren, Christian Schmidt and
Philipp Isaak, visited Your Excellency in Ekaterinoslav to request
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…