← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 433 (not an original page number)
Unit 433 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
the
446
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
release of our minister, H. Huebert, who was being held in detention,
Your Excellency was so cordial and affable as to ask them about the
present state of our fellowship, because a schism had occurred in our
fellowship through the craftiness of the enemy of our souls. At that time
these brethren shared some things orally with Your Excellency, and
mentioned that for the sake of unity and general peace, a number of rules
had been formulated and agreed upon, which were being preserved in
writing by the church, and were being put into practice in life. As
always, Your Excellency again took special Christian interest in our
struggles and triumphs, and wished to obtain some written statements
regarding the most recent occurrences in our midst. Since we have the
liberty to entrust ourselves and our concerns to you, because we
thankfully recognize how in your hands, these concerns serve to promote
God’s Kingdom, we feel free to expound the following to Your
Excellency:
I. In His counsel, God, through the will of His only beloved Son,
our Lord and Savior, succeeded in calling us out of a dead Christendom
into a church which was to evidence true Christian freedom in word and
deed before the whole world. As a light which is not put under a bushel
or table, but is set on the table so that it will illuminate the house, so the
good works of the divinely called church should shine in order that the
world recognize that God is truly with us, and thereby the Father in
heaven be praised. The church that had seceded from the world and
separated itself from her set this as its goal from the beginning: to
experience its calling from the Word of God and then not to discuss the
fulfillment of God’s truth with flesh and blood, but to proceed
forthrightly— even if she were ridiculed and hated by everyone— to fulfill
the recognized will of the holy triune God with as much understanding
and strength as had been given her. Persecution by those who hated
them started as soon as the church began to serve as salt in the world,
and reveal the divine pleasure in the salvation of the whole human race,
which had fallen into sin. Their contemporaries falsely accused them of
scandalous, sinful transgressions, so that the authorities called on them
to answer the charges, and inflicted corporal punishment on some church
members without cause. On such occasions brethren commissioned by
the church were granted numerous opportunities to express orally and in
writing the reasons for the hope that lay within them. Thus when the
church sent Johann Claassen of Liebenau to the Ministry of Crown
Lands to justify her in the face of false slander by private and
government personnel, he had occasion, during his stay in St.
Petersburg, to present the complete Confession of Faith of the
Rudnerweide 225 Mennonite Church here. These confessions, regardless
of the fact that no Mennonite clergy could refute them
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…