← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 434 (not an original page number)
Unit 434 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
, were almost or
Documentary Supplements
447
entirely disregarded. The one demand always persisted: that we could
not form an independent church, but must definitely return to the
churches in which we had been bom, which now hated, persecuted and
excommunicated us because we were children of God. Because these
demands could not be sufficiently satisfied, false witnesses were again
used to defame us before the whole world. In spite of being dragged from
Herod to Pilate, our church remained true to its confession and
maintained its efforts to add to her divine knowledge in order to attain
godly maturity.
II. Then we come to the question whether we, who call ourselves
children of God, have done nothing amiss. Have we observed the adage
to deprive the enemy of every reason for which he could speak evil of us?
Have we always behaved blamelessly toward our brothers in the flesh 226
and given them no offense or annoyance? We must admit, to our own
shame, that in the face of the hostile attitude they continually showed
toward us, we did not all maintain Christian love, but frequently fought
for the honor of the Savior with strange and false zeal, behaving
unwisely toward those who are outside, and thereby giving manifold
occasion for irritation. Yet because we generally endeavored to search for
the evangelical truth and ordered our conduct accordingly, the Lord was
gracious toward us, so that we acknowledged and repented of the wrong
we committed in ignorance, but which we later recognized, and cleansed
ourselves of all the dross that clung to us. Our church grew and
increased in knowledge and membership.
III. After many a persecution had come over the church, and Satan,
as a roaring lion, had seen that he was incapable of harming us with his
blood-thirsty manipulations, he then tried to steal into the flock of Christ
in another manner, in the form of an angel. Some brethren who had the
respect of the church began to preach doctrines that came from an
egotistic spirit, and were contrary to the essence of the Gospel. The
admonition which the Apostle Paul gave to bishops and elders in Acts
20:28-32, was not sufficiently heeded. Therefore gruesome wolves
invaded the flock and did not spare it, but through lovelessness and a
judgmental and domineering spirit brought it to the point where a
schism occurred.
Primarily, the church sinned in that: 1. All interaction with the
believers who had left the church because of the unrighteous conduct [see
4. and 8. above], or had been thrust from it, was suspended. No kiss or
greeting or other friendly encounter in word or deed was permitted to
occur. 2. Interaction with those who were outside was spoken of and
carried out so roughly that no one could gain confidence in the believers.
Instead the world 227 was rejected and provoked to anger because it was
regarded with disdain. 3. Finally, the happy and frivolous manner of
448
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…