← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 448 (not an original page number)
Unit 448 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
ring the afternoon, and the congregation supported the motion. At
two o’clock the congregation was again assembled. After a song and
prayer, the chairman asked whether the election should be determined by
a majority vote; the suggestion was approved. Br. Benzien and the old
Br. Johann Wieler (school teacher, father of Gerhard and Johann Wieler)
stepped into a side room in order to receive the votes (an old Mennonite
election procedure). After the election, having received a majority of the
votes, Br. Abraham Unger was appointed elder. 251 Abraham Unger had
received 21 votes, Aron Lepp 9, and Peter Friesen 6. It is evident from
this small number of actual votes that a number of brethren still did not
participate. “This is how the church was provided with elders and
teachers.” But because divergent sentiments and views prevailed among
the members, and because the Word of God was being interpreted in
various ways, things did not go so well, and the situation still left much
to be desired. “But the Lord, who had begun this work, knew also how to
carry it further.”
2. Johann Gerhard Oncken
a) In 1869 Brother Oncken (founder and elder of the Hamburg
Baptist Church) came from Hamburg and visited the Old and New Danzig
brethren (cf. #149) in Southern Russia. He sought to unite the brethren
who preached the Word in the Einlage Church. Since Aron Lepp had
resigned from his office as teacher during Br. Oncken’s stay, the church
found it necessary to elect a minister again. But Br. Lepp was elected
again. A meeting was scheduled for October 18, 1869, in Einlage, to be
held in the home of Br. Unger. Here Br. Oncken ordained the brethren
§200
462
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
Abraham Unger as elder, Aron Lepp as minister, and Cornelius Unger
and Benjamin Nickel as deacons for the Einlage M.B. Church (cf. #96);
likewise Br. Karl Benzien was ordained as minister for the Baptist
Church which, consisting of members of non-Mennonite origin, had been
established in the Tschomoglas Colony. Unfortunately, Br. Oncken could
stay only ten days among the Einlage and Tschomoglas brethren. The
Molotschna brethren wanted to have him in their midst as well,
but since winter was at hand and the seventy-year-old man had to make
the return journey by water and coach, without a travelling companion,
he hurried home “and the church was left to itself and continued to work
as well as it could.”
b) Oncken ’s account of his journey.
Fortunately we have Oncken’s own narrative concerning this visit
and his very clear analysis of the relationship between Mennonite
Brethren and Baptists, about which false assertions have been made
to this very day— either out of ignorance or intentionally. It is very
interesting to note, that whereas Liebig was arrested in 1866, Oncken
preached in the churches of Chortitza and Schoenwiese in 18691 Oncken
writes, in the Missionsblatt der Gemeinde getaufter Christen (1869, page
180ff), as follows:
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…