← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 452 (not an original page number)
Unit 452 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Br. A. Unger
as elder and myself as minister. Br. Benzien once again worked towards
the unification of the Baptists and our church. I felt then that it was my
duty to protect our church. And so there was constant friction between
the Baptist-minded, whom Br. Unger supported, and our brethren. The
reason why I was opposed to a complete merger with the Baptists was
this: 1) I feared that we would lose our privileges in this way; 2) our
confessions of faith were divergent; 3) some developments occurred
which, in my view, were not proper; for example, Br. Benzien had
remarked that he intended to visit our brethren once more in order to
pull at the corroded Mennonite sword.
"And thus matters continued until, in 1869, Br. Oncken arrived from
Hamburg, and, as we know, performed the ordination of Br. Unger as
elder, and of Benzien and my hunble self as ministers. [N.B.! According
to Baptist principles of office and ordination, ordination to the office of
‘elder’ and ‘ minis ter’ bears equal status, and the ordination of a minister
for service as presiding elder need not be repeated. Consequently, the
worthy Br. Lepp had received the consecration of a full Baptist bishop.]
The reason why I, in those critical times, submitted to ordination by a
Baptist elder was solely that I wanted to prevent a division in our
congregation. [As is known, Lepp was ordained once again in 1876 as
466
THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH
§202
elder of the Einlage M.B. Church by Elder Janz of Friedensfeld; that is
the laying on of Mennonite hands. See note above on ordination by Elder
Janz. 255 ] With God’s gracious help, the work advanced. Special
difficulties were created once more by the activity of Br. Eduard Leppke,
who defended the anti-Baptist faction too vigorously. Unfortunately, I
too allowed myself at first to be carried away too far by him, but I soon
realized and regretted this error. [See further under ‘Baptists as
super-Mennonites!’’] And so the year 1876 arrived. Br. A. Unger
resigned from his office as elder. The congregation elected me for this
position, which seemed very difficult for me."
4. The Second Call to Br. August Liebig— the First General
Conference (Annual Session).
a) On January 6, 1871, Brother Aron Lepp proposed that Br.
August Liebig be asked to visit the church once again. This proposal was
accepted, and Br. Liebig was prepared to come to Russia again. (The
attitude of the authorities towards the Baptists had improved in the
meantime; by an edict of March 27, 1879, the Baptists were numbered
among the Protestant confessions.) In June, 1871, Liebig arrived with
wife and child and lived for a year in Andreasfeld. “The church found
itself in a distempered condition.” One held to this view, the other to
another view. Thus Minister Liebig had much work to do in order to
bring individual tempers into a more relaxed and gentle condition. He
spoke little, and kept himself above all partisanship, often
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…