Avakum
Checking archive
← Research Library
Indexed source

THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911

Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.

2,951 passagesText fragments 1–984; these are not original page numberslanguage not recorded
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet

Text fragment 452 (not an original page number)

Unit 452 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
Exact extracted unit
Br. A. Unger as elder and myself as minister. Br. Benzien once again worked towards the unification of the Baptists and our church. I felt then that it was my duty to protect our church. And so there was constant friction between the Baptist-minded, whom Br. Unger supported, and our brethren. The reason why I was opposed to a complete merger with the Baptists was this: 1) I feared that we would lose our privileges in this way; 2) our confessions of faith were divergent; 3) some developments occurred which, in my view, were not proper; for example, Br. Benzien had remarked that he intended to visit our brethren once more in order to pull at the corroded Mennonite sword. "And thus matters continued until, in 1869, Br. Oncken arrived from Hamburg, and, as we know, performed the ordination of Br. Unger as elder, and of Benzien and my hunble self as ministers. [N.B.! According to Baptist principles of office and ordination, ordination to the office of ‘elder’ and ‘ minis ter’ bears equal status, and the ordination of a minister for service as presiding elder need not be repeated. Consequently, the worthy Br. Lepp had received the consecration of a full Baptist bishop.] The reason why I, in those critical times, submitted to ordination by a Baptist elder was solely that I wanted to prevent a division in our congregation. [As is known, Lepp was ordained once again in 1876 as 466 THE MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH §202 elder of the Einlage M.B. Church by Elder Janz of Friedensfeld; that is the laying on of Mennonite hands. See note above on ordination by Elder Janz. 255 ] With God’s gracious help, the work advanced. Special difficulties were created once more by the activity of Br. Eduard Leppke, who defended the anti-Baptist faction too vigorously. Unfortunately, I too allowed myself at first to be carried away too far by him, but I soon realized and regretted this error. [See further under ‘Baptists as super-Mennonites!’’] And so the year 1876 arrived. Br. A. Unger resigned from his office as elder. The congregation elected me for this position, which seemed very difficult for me." 4. The Second Call to Br. August Liebig— the First General Conference (Annual Session). a) On January 6, 1871, Brother Aron Lepp proposed that Br. August Liebig be asked to visit the church once again. This proposal was accepted, and Br. Liebig was prepared to come to Russia again. (The attitude of the authorities towards the Baptists had improved in the meantime; by an edict of March 27, 1879, the Baptists were numbered among the Protestant confessions.) In June, 1871, Liebig arrived with wife and child and lived for a year in Andreasfeld. “The church found itself in a distempered condition.” One held to this view, the other to another view. Thus Minister Liebig had much work to do in order to bring individual tempers into a more relaxed and gentle condition. He spoke little, and kept himself above all partisanship, often

Source excerpts

[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…