← Research LibraryExact extracted unit
Indexed source
THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911
Available for full-text research. Open the source to inspect original-language passages and page references.
VerificationThe full text is searchable; full source verification is not yet recorded.
Citation checksNo verified references are recorded yet
Research profileNot current yet
Text fragment 453 (not an original page number)
Unit 453 of 984. Only the selected source passage is shown.
sought
solitude, and committed the contending brethren to the Lord that He
might unite their hearts. He had not labored long when it became
evident “that the Lord was with him and would grant him success,
because He had given him wisdom.” He did not pay respect to persons
and in fact reprimanded most severely the faction which was closest to
him. “He created much good will among us. Since that time church
business meetings, and the Sunday School, have been conducted
regularly according to his mode. He also introduced the prayer hour on
Sunday morning.”
b) The year drew to a close all too soon, and Br. Liebig had to
return again to his work in Dobrudscha. The ministers in the church
were on the way towards unity, and the church perceived that much
good had come her way through Br. Liebig. The “itinerant preacher com-
mittee” was also created. Likewise, the relationship among the individual
congregations (Molotschna, Einlage, Kuban and their affiliates) was
clearly regulated, as were also their annual business meetings (annual
sessions, General Conference) as a General Conference. Similarly, he
brought method to the collection and administration of contributed
monies, to the remuneration of itinerant preachers, and later to the
convening of annual Bible courses which lasted one month, at that time
Molotschna and Kuban 1865-73
467
designated, rather presumptiously, as “missionary schools." The crea-
tion of these schools, intended primarily for ministers and ministerial
candidates, was essentially his very valuable contribution, a work which
produced permanent blessings. Later, when in 1875 he took up
permanent residence in Russia and assumed the pastoral leadership of
the congregation at Odessa (in both city and rural areas), he conducted
these Bible courses year after year, and presided at the annual business
sessions as well. According to Br. Unger’s annual report for 1872
(original) , the first annual business meeting of the M.B. General Conference
convened on May 12, 1872, in Andreasfeld.
Elder Liebig left the distinctly Mennonite confession of the M.B. §203
Church untouched. May our ever-fond recollection of the Mennonite Breth-
ren Church and the rich kindness of God, in this life and in eternity, be then-
reward in the case of both the worthy, now venerable, Bishop Liebig and
his former teacher— who also extended pastoral assistance to us— the
late J. G. Oncken, and also the late Karl Benzien. We are glad to be able
to report that in North America as well, where Minister Liebig now lives,
he enjoys a brotherly and “ministerial” relationship with those “very
Mennonite” M.B. churches, as a director of “Bible schools" (courses)
among them.
The Einlage Mennonite Brethren Church concluded the year 1872
with a membership of 180, apart from 61 members who actually belong
to the Alliance Baptist Church of Tschomoglas.
XXVII.
THE M.B. CHURCH IN THE MOLOTSCHNA AND THE KUBAN
FROM 1865/66 TO 1
Source excerpts
[THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA (1789 - 1910), P. M. Friesen, 1911. Книга представляет документальную историю Меннонитской братской общины в России (1789-1910), основанную на архивных материалах, собранных автором за 25 лет. Автор, П. М. Фризен, со] P. M. FRIESEN OTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) P. M. Friesen THE MENNONITE BROTHERHOOD IN RUSSIA ( 1789 - 1910 ) How do you write the history of a movement when you are still a part of that movement? Whom do you believe when leading participants in those historical events disagree strongly not only on why things happened, but also on what happen- ed? What imparts the ring of truth to a denominational history? For P. M. Friesen the answer was a documentary history, letting the record speak for itself. Gathering historical docu- ments ov…